GHSA-8GXF-54JP-WCCF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-21 00:30 – Updated: 2024-09-03 15:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: wan: fsl_qmc_hdlc: Convert carrier_lock spinlock to a mutex

The carrier_lock spinlock protects the carrier detection. While it is held, framer_get_status() is called which in turn takes a mutex. This is not correct and can lead to a deadlock.

A run with PROVE_LOCKING enabled detected the issue: [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] ... c204ddbc (&framer->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: framer_get_status+0x40/0x78 other info that might help us debug this: context-{4:4} 2 locks held by ifconfig/146: #0: c0926a38 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devinet_ioctl+0x12c/0x664 #1: c2006a40 (&qmc_hdlc->carrier_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: qmc_hdlc_framer_set_carrier+0x30/0x98

Avoid the spinlock usage and convert carrier_lock to a mutex.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-43862"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-21T00:15:04Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: wan: fsl_qmc_hdlc: Convert carrier_lock spinlock to a mutex\n\nThe carrier_lock spinlock protects the carrier detection. While it is\nheld, framer_get_status() is called which in turn takes a mutex.\nThis is not correct and can lead to a deadlock.\n\nA run with PROVE_LOCKING enabled detected the issue:\n  [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]\n  ...\n  c204ddbc (\u0026framer-\u003emutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: framer_get_status+0x40/0x78\n  other info that might help us debug this:\n  context-{4:4}\n  2 locks held by ifconfig/146:\n  #0: c0926a38 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devinet_ioctl+0x12c/0x664\n  #1: c2006a40 (\u0026qmc_hdlc-\u003ecarrier_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: qmc_hdlc_framer_set_carrier+0x30/0x98\n\nAvoid the spinlock usage and convert carrier_lock to a mutex.",
  "id": "GHSA-8gxf-54jp-wccf",
  "modified": "2024-09-03T15:30:39Z",
  "published": "2024-08-21T00:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43862"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c4d6a347ba7babdf9d90a0eb24048c266cae0532"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f223d2b4acb7a45a6e0581cb380e1af1a6dc7ab9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…