GHSA-8CMF-4X36-QP8X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-27 06:31 – Updated: 2026-08-27 06:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/zcrypt: Improve CCA CPRB length and overflow checks
The xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx() function lacks proper input validation, creating security vulnerabilities: 1. Integer overflow after CEIL4 alignment: Signed int variables could overflow during 4-byte boundary alignment, causing undersized buffer allocations or incorrect bounds checking. 2. Missing minimum size validation: The CPRBX structure is copied from userspace without verifying sufficient buffer length. Undersized buffers cause uninitialized memory access when reading structure fields like cprbx.cprb_len and cprbx.domain. 3. Arithmetic overflow in sum calculations: Adding control block and data block sizes could overflow, bypassing size checks and enabling buffer overflows.
Fix by using size_t for length calculations, adding U32_MAX boundary checks after alignment, validating minimum control block size before copying from userspace, and detecting sum calculation overflows.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-80546"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-26T15:17:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/zcrypt: Improve CCA CPRB length and overflow checks\n\nThe xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx() function lacks proper input\nvalidation, creating security vulnerabilities:\n1. Integer overflow after CEIL4 alignment: Signed int variables could\n overflow during 4-byte boundary alignment, causing undersized\n buffer allocations or incorrect bounds checking.\n2. Missing minimum size validation: The CPRBX structure is copied from\n userspace without verifying sufficient buffer length. Undersized\n buffers cause uninitialized memory access when reading structure\n fields like cprbx.cprb_len and cprbx.domain.\n3. Arithmetic overflow in sum calculations: Adding control block and\n data block sizes could overflow, bypassing size checks and enabling\n buffer overflows.\n\nFix by using size_t for length calculations, adding U32_MAX boundary\nchecks after alignment, validating minimum control block size before\ncopying from userspace, and detecting sum calculation overflows.",
"id": "GHSA-8cmf-4x36-qp8x",
"modified": "2026-08-27T06:31:31Z",
"published": "2026-08-27T06:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80546"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35ac6754ba6da45fd193f5ce3f665f7490b830d5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/50fe5133dcb46449daf2435fa705264364411129"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.