GHSA-8CMF-4X36-QP8X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-27 06:31 – Updated: 2026-08-27 06:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

s390/zcrypt: Improve CCA CPRB length and overflow checks

The xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx() function lacks proper input validation, creating security vulnerabilities: 1. Integer overflow after CEIL4 alignment: Signed int variables could overflow during 4-byte boundary alignment, causing undersized buffer allocations or incorrect bounds checking. 2. Missing minimum size validation: The CPRBX structure is copied from userspace without verifying sufficient buffer length. Undersized buffers cause uninitialized memory access when reading structure fields like cprbx.cprb_len and cprbx.domain. 3. Arithmetic overflow in sum calculations: Adding control block and data block sizes could overflow, bypassing size checks and enabling buffer overflows.

Fix by using size_t for length calculations, adding U32_MAX boundary checks after alignment, validating minimum control block size before copying from userspace, and detecting sum calculation overflows.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80546"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-26T15:17:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/zcrypt: Improve CCA CPRB length and overflow checks\n\nThe xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx() function lacks proper input\nvalidation, creating security vulnerabilities:\n1. Integer overflow after CEIL4 alignment: Signed int variables could\n   overflow during 4-byte boundary alignment, causing undersized\n   buffer allocations or incorrect bounds checking.\n2. Missing minimum size validation: The CPRBX structure is copied from\n   userspace without verifying sufficient buffer length. Undersized\n   buffers cause uninitialized memory access when reading structure\n   fields like cprbx.cprb_len and cprbx.domain.\n3. Arithmetic overflow in sum calculations: Adding control block and\n   data block sizes could overflow, bypassing size checks and enabling\n   buffer overflows.\n\nFix by using size_t for length calculations, adding U32_MAX boundary\nchecks after alignment, validating minimum control block size before\ncopying from userspace, and detecting sum calculation overflows.",
  "id": "GHSA-8cmf-4x36-qp8x",
  "modified": "2026-08-27T06:31:31Z",
  "published": "2026-08-27T06:31:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80546"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35ac6754ba6da45fd193f5ce3f665f7490b830d5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/50fe5133dcb46449daf2435fa705264364411129"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…