GHSA-8CCV-3J8R-HX7F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-18 15:31 – Updated: 2025-11-03 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: reject on-disk inodes of an unsupported type
Syzbot has reported the following BUG:
kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:668! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 139 Comm: jfsCommit Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-syzkaller-00085-g4e46774408d9 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:clear_inode+0x168/0x190 Code: 4c 89 f7 e8 ba fe e5 ff e9 61 ff ff ff 44 89 f1 80 e1 07 80 c1 03 38 c1 7c c1 4c 89 f7 e8 90 ff e5 ff eb b7 0b e8 01 5d 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f9 5c 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f1 5c 7f RSP: 0018:ffffc900027dfae8 EFLAGS: 00010093 RAX: ffffffff82157a87 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888104d4b980 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc900027dfc90 R08: ffffffff82157977 R09: fffff520004fbf38 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff520004fbf38 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffff88811315bc00 R14: ffff88811315bda8 R15: ffff88811315bb80 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888135f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005565222e0578 CR3: 0000000026ef0000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: ? __die_body+0x5f/0xb0 ? die+0x9e/0xc0 ? do_trap+0x15a/0x3a0 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? do_error_trap+0x1dc/0x2c0 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? __pfx_do_error_trap+0x10/0x10 ? report_bug+0x3cd/0x500 ? handle_invalid_op+0x34/0x40 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? exc_invalid_op+0x38/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? clear_inode+0x57/0x190 ? clear_inode+0x167/0x190 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? clear_inode+0x167/0x190 jfs_evict_inode+0xb5/0x440 ? __pfx_jfs_evict_inode+0x10/0x10 evict+0x4ea/0x9b0 ? __pfx_evict+0x10/0x10 ? iput+0x713/0xa50 txUpdateMap+0x931/0xb10 ? __pfx_txUpdateMap+0x10/0x10 jfs_lazycommit+0x49a/0xb80 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8f/0x140 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x99/0x150 ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_default_wake_function+0x10/0x10 ? __kthread_parkme+0x169/0x1d0 ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2f2/0x390 ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
This happens when 'clear_inode()' makes an attempt to finalize an underlying JFS inode of unknown type. According to JFS layout description from https://jfs.sourceforge.net/project/pub/jfslayout.pdf, inode types from 5 to 15 are reserved for future extensions and should not be encountered on a valid filesystem. So add an extra check for valid inode type in 'copy_from_dinode()'.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-37925"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-18T07:15:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njfs: reject on-disk inodes of an unsupported type\n\nSyzbot has reported the following BUG:\n\nkernel BUG at fs/inode.c:668!\nOops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 139 Comm: jfsCommit Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-syzkaller-00085-g4e46774408d9 #0\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:clear_inode+0x168/0x190\nCode: 4c 89 f7 e8 ba fe e5 ff e9 61 ff ff ff 44 89 f1 80 e1 07 80 c1 03 38 c1 7c c1 4c 89 f7 e8 90 ff e5 ff eb b7\n 0b e8 01 5d 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f9 5c 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f1 5c 7f\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900027dfae8 EFLAGS: 00010093\nRAX: ffffffff82157a87 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888104d4b980\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: ffffc900027dfc90 R08: ffffffff82157977 R09: fffff520004fbf38\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff520004fbf38 R12: dffffc0000000000\nR13: ffff88811315bc00 R14: ffff88811315bda8 R15: ffff88811315bb80\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888135f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00005565222e0578 CR3: 0000000026ef0000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die_body+0x5f/0xb0\n ? die+0x9e/0xc0\n ? do_trap+0x15a/0x3a0\n ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190\n ? do_error_trap+0x1dc/0x2c0\n ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190\n ? __pfx_do_error_trap+0x10/0x10\n ? report_bug+0x3cd/0x500\n ? handle_invalid_op+0x34/0x40\n ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x38/0x50\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n ? clear_inode+0x57/0x190\n ? clear_inode+0x167/0x190\n ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190\n ? clear_inode+0x167/0x190\n jfs_evict_inode+0xb5/0x440\n ? __pfx_jfs_evict_inode+0x10/0x10\n evict+0x4ea/0x9b0\n ? __pfx_evict+0x10/0x10\n ? iput+0x713/0xa50\n txUpdateMap+0x931/0xb10\n ? __pfx_txUpdateMap+0x10/0x10\n jfs_lazycommit+0x49a/0xb80\n ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8f/0x140\n ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x99/0x150\n ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx_default_wake_function+0x10/0x10\n ? __kthread_parkme+0x169/0x1d0\n ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0x2f2/0x390\n ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nThis happens when \u0027clear_inode()\u0027 makes an attempt to finalize an underlying\nJFS inode of unknown type. According to JFS layout description from\nhttps://jfs.sourceforge.net/project/pub/jfslayout.pdf, inode types from 5 to\n15 are reserved for future extensions and should not be encountered on a valid\nfilesystem. So add an extra check for valid inode type in \u0027copy_from_dinode()\u0027.",
"id": "GHSA-8ccv-3j8r-hx7f",
"modified": "2025-11-03T18:31:15Z",
"published": "2025-04-18T15:31:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37925"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/28419a4f3a1eeee33472a1b3856ae62aaa5a649b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45fd8421081ec79e661e5f3ead2934fdbddb4287"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8987891c4653874d5e3f5d11f063912f4e0b58eb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c3f9a70d2d4dd6c640afe294b05c6a0a45434d9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/afc08b0b5587b553799bc375957706936a3e0088"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa6ce4a9cc9fcc8150b80db6f65186c0ed2b3143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.