GHSA-8C24-7WP3-Q8GP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 18:32 – Updated: 2026-06-24 18:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Do not allow deleting local storage in NMI

Currently, local storage may deadlock when deferring freeing selem or local storage through kfree_rcu(), call_rcu() or call_rcu_tasks_trace() in NMI or reentrant. Since deleting selem in NMI is an unlikely use case, partially mitigate it by returning error when calling from bpf_xxx_storage_delete() helpers in NMI. Note that, it is still possible to deadlock through reentrant. A full mitigation requires returning error when irqs_disabled() is true, which, however is too heavy-handed for bpf_xxx_storage_delete().

The long-term solution requires _nolock versions of call_rcu. Another possible solution is to defer the free through irq_work [0], but it would grow the size of selem, which is non-ideal.

The check is only needed in bpf_selem_unlink(), which is used by helpers and syscalls. bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() is fine as it is called during map and owner tear down that never run in NMI or reentrant.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260205190233.912-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53106"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T17:17:24Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Do not allow deleting local storage in NMI\n\nCurrently, local storage may deadlock when deferring freeing selem or\nlocal storage through kfree_rcu(), call_rcu() or call_rcu_tasks_trace()\nin NMI or reentrant. Since deleting selem in NMI is an unlikely use\ncase, partially mitigate it by returning error when calling from\nbpf_xxx_storage_delete() helpers in NMI. Note that, it is still possible\nto deadlock through reentrant. A full mitigation requires returning\nerror when irqs_disabled() is true, which, however is too heavy-handed\nfor bpf_xxx_storage_delete().\n\nThe long-term solution requires _nolock versions of call_rcu. Another\npossible solution is to defer the free through irq_work [0], but it\nwould grow the size of selem, which is non-ideal.\n\nThe check is only needed in bpf_selem_unlink(), which is used by helpers\nand syscalls. bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() is fine as it is called during\nmap and owner tear down that never run in NMI or reentrant.\n\n[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260205190233.912-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/",
  "id": "GHSA-8c24-7wp3-q8gp",
  "modified": "2026-06-24T18:32:47Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T18:32:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53106"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/350de5b8a9befaa2a68861c51f671d4f5f751ca5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e84acaf936970b5b0be2c93bbf255295ba9406df"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…