GHSA-89G7-22C8-3J23
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-19 19:23 – Updated: 2026-06-19 19:23Description
When a #[LiveProp] is typed as a DateTimeInterface and no explicit format is configured, Symfony\UX\LiveComponent\LiveComponentHydrator::hydrateObjectValue() falls back to new $className($value). The DateTime / DateTimeImmutable constructors accept relative strings such as "now", "tomorrow", or "+10 years", so a writable, format-less date prop can be pushed to an arbitrary point in time by the client. Components that rely on a date prop to gate time-based business logic can be moved past those checks by a frontend payload that no maintainer would consider a valid date.
Resolution
hydrateObjectValue() now parses format-less date props strictly with createFromFormat(DateTimeInterface::RFC3339, ...), matching the format already emitted by dehydrateObjectValue(). Normal round-trips are unaffected; only inputs that aren't valid RFC 3339 are now rejected, which is consistent with how a format-configured prop already behaved.
The patch for this issue is available here for branch 2.x (and forward-ported to 3.x).
Credits
Symfony would like to thank Pascal Cescon for reporting the issue and Hugo Alliaume for providing the fix.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/ux-live-component"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.8.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.36.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/ux-live-component"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49208"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-19T19:23:55Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Description\n\nWhen a `#[LiveProp]` is typed as a `DateTimeInterface` and no explicit `format` is configured, `Symfony\\UX\\LiveComponent\\LiveComponentHydrator::hydrateObjectValue()` falls back to `new $className($value)`. The `DateTime` / `DateTimeImmutable` constructors accept relative strings such as `\"now\"`, `\"tomorrow\"`, or `\"+10 years\"`, so a writable, format-less date prop can be pushed to an arbitrary point in time by the client. Components that rely on a date prop to gate time-based business logic can be moved past those checks by a frontend payload that no maintainer would consider a valid date.\n\n### Resolution\n\n`hydrateObjectValue()` now parses format-less date props strictly with `createFromFormat(DateTimeInterface::RFC3339, ...)`, matching the format already emitted by `dehydrateObjectValue()`. Normal round-trips are unaffected; only inputs that aren\u0027t valid RFC 3339 are now rejected, which is consistent with how a format-configured prop already behaved.\n\nThe patch for this issue is available [here](https://github.com/symfony/ux/commit/d24d78fda6df2d5964312255943ebf3a217b79a2) for branch 2.x (and forward-ported to 3.x).\n\n### Credits\n\nSymfony would like to thank Pascal Cescon for reporting the issue and Hugo Alliaume for providing the fix.",
"id": "GHSA-89g7-22c8-3j23",
"modified": "2026-06-19T19:23:55Z",
"published": "2026-06-19T19:23:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/ux/security/advisories/GHSA-89g7-22c8-3j23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/ux/commit/d24d78fda6df2d5964312255943ebf3a217b79a2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/symfony/ux-live-component/CVE-2026-49208.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/ux"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "ux-live-component: Format-less date LiveProps parsed with the permissive DateTime constructor"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.