GHSA-87CJ-725F-6HR5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31
VLAI
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: Fix register corruption from uninitialized cregs on error
compat_riscv_gpr_set() calls cregs_to_regs() unconditionally, even when user_regset_copyin() fails. Since cregs is an uninitialized stack variable, a copyin failure causes uninitialized stack data to be written into the target task's pt_regs, corrupting its register state and potentially leaking kernel stack contents.
compat_restore_sigcontext() has the same issue: it calls cregs_to_regs() even when __copy_from_user() fails, leading to the same corruption of the signal-returning task's register state on error.
Only call cregs_to_regs() when the user copy succeeds.
Severity
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-64082"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:48Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nriscv: Fix register corruption from uninitialized cregs on error\n\ncompat_riscv_gpr_set() calls cregs_to_regs() unconditionally, even when\nuser_regset_copyin() fails. Since cregs is an uninitialized stack\nvariable, a copyin failure causes uninitialized stack data to be written\ninto the target task\u0027s pt_regs, corrupting its register state and\npotentially leaking kernel stack contents.\n\ncompat_restore_sigcontext() has the same issue: it calls cregs_to_regs()\neven when __copy_from_user() fails, leading to the same corruption of\nthe signal-returning task\u0027s register state on error.\n\nOnly call cregs_to_regs() when the user copy succeeds.",
"id": "GHSA-87cj-725f-6hr5",
"modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:58Z",
"published": "2026-07-19T18:31:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64082"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ebcbb53fc9bc30843054ed99fd60b8e542628f4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9e020156833f1ad0d425a1e3d85b65639f1c1c50"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…