GHSA-85JQ-W8XM-9RCM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-01 15:30 – Updated: 2026-05-07 21:30
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

PM: EM: Fix NULL pointer dereference when perf domain ID is not found

dev_energymodel_nl_get_perf_domains_doit() calls em_perf_domain_get_by_id() but does not check the return value before passing it to __em_nl_get_pd_size(). When a caller supplies a non-existent perf domain ID, em_perf_domain_get_by_id() returns NULL, and __em_nl_get_pd_size() immediately dereferences pd->cpus (struct offset 0x30), causing a NULL pointer dereference.

The sister handler dev_energymodel_nl_get_perf_table_doit() already handles this correctly via __em_nl_get_pd_table_id(), which returns NULL and causes the caller to return -EINVAL. Add the same NULL check in the get-perf-domains do handler.

[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31744"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-01T15:16:37Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPM: EM: Fix NULL pointer dereference when perf domain ID is not found\n\ndev_energymodel_nl_get_perf_domains_doit() calls\nem_perf_domain_get_by_id() but does not check the return value before\npassing it to __em_nl_get_pd_size(). When a caller supplies a\nnon-existent perf domain ID, em_perf_domain_get_by_id() returns NULL,\nand __em_nl_get_pd_size() immediately dereferences pd-\u003ecpus\n(struct offset 0x30), causing a NULL pointer dereference.\n\nThe sister handler dev_energymodel_nl_get_perf_table_doit() already\nhandles this correctly via __em_nl_get_pd_table_id(), which returns\nNULL and causes the caller to return -EINVAL. Add the same NULL check\nin the get-perf-domains do handler.\n\n[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]",
  "id": "GHSA-85jq-w8xm-9rcm",
  "modified": "2026-05-07T21:30:23Z",
  "published": "2026-05-01T15:30:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31744"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9badc2a84e688be1275bb740942d5f6f51746908"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab09b9a1e3b02ff62c5aebe3b12b0cb4cb4ea8ab"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…