GHSA-8439-X5CQ-4PMJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:48 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:40
VLAI?
Details

SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP 7.40 allows remote authenticated users with certain privileges to cause a denial of service (process crash) via vectors involving disp+work.exe, aka SAP Security Note 2406841.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-9843"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-07-12T16:29:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP 7.40 allows remote authenticated users with certain privileges to cause a denial of service (process crash) via vectors involving disp+work.exe, aka SAP Security Note 2406841.",
  "id": "GHSA-8439-x5cq-4pmj",
  "modified": "2025-04-20T03:40:37Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:48:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9843"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-17-010-sap-netweaver-abap-dispwork-crash-using-cl_java_script"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96900"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…