GHSA-82R8-9JG2-XFC8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:10 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:10
VLAI
Details
Western Digital SanDisk X300, X300s, X400, and X600 devices: A vulnerability in the wear-leveling algorithm of the drive may cause cryptographically sensitive parameters (such as data encryption keys) to remain on the drive media after their intended erasure.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-11686"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-03-10T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Western Digital SanDisk X300, X300s, X400, and X600 devices: A vulnerability in the wear-leveling algorithm of the drive may cause cryptographically sensitive parameters (such as data encryption keys) to remain on the drive media after their intended erasure.",
"id": "GHSA-82r8-9jg2-xfc8",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:10:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:10:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11686"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.wdc.com/downloads.aspx?g=907\u0026lang=en"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.westerndigital.com/support/productsecurity/wdc-19006-sandisk-x600-sata-ssd"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.westerndigital.com/support/productsecurity/wdc-19007-sandisk-x300-x400-sata-s"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…