GHSA-7X79-HRPM-VW9W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-23 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-24 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

riscv: entry: gate shadow call stack reload on sstatus.SPP, not tp

Under CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK, handle_exception() reloads the kernel shadow call stack pointer (gp) only when the trap came from userspace. It made that decision with scs_load_current_if_task_changed, which compares the trap-time tp (read back from sscratch into s5) against the current tp:

beq \prev, tp, _skip_scs
scs_load_current

_skip_scs:

tp is a user-writable register. A user task that sets tp to the linear-map address of its own task_struct (&current) before trapping makes the comparison succeed (can achieve by brute force with KASLR enable under our test), so the kernel skips scs_load_current and keeps running with the gp that userspace left in place. Under CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK gp is the shadow call stack pointer and load_global_pointer is a no-op, so the compiler-emitted "sd ra, -8(gp)" / "ld ra, -8(gp)" in every non-leaf function then write to, and return through, an attacker-controlled address -- an unprivileged kernel arbitrary-write and control-flow-hijack primitive. The poisoned gp is saved to task_struct.scs_sp on return, so the reload is skipped on every subsequent entry as well.

Decide "came from userspace" from the hardware sstatus.SPP bit (already in s1 at this point) instead of from tp, mirroring the check that ret_from_exception already uses a few instructions later. SPP is written by hardware on trap entry and cannot be forged from U-mode. Legitimate behaviour is unchanged: user entries (SPP=0) reload the task shadow call stack, nested kernel entries (SPP=1) skip it.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-99018"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-23T13:17:24Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nriscv: entry: gate shadow call stack reload on sstatus.SPP, not tp\n\nUnder CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK, handle_exception() reloads the kernel\nshadow call stack pointer (gp) only when the trap came from userspace.\nIt made that decision with scs_load_current_if_task_changed, which\ncompares the trap-time tp (read back from sscratch into s5) against the\ncurrent tp:\n\n\tbeq\t\\prev, tp, _skip_scs\n\tscs_load_current\n_skip_scs:\n\ntp is a user-writable register.  A user task that sets tp to the\nlinear-map address of its own task_struct (\u0026current) before trapping\nmakes the comparison succeed (can achieve by brute force with KASLR\nenable under our test), so the kernel skips scs_load_current and\nkeeps running with the gp that userspace left in place.  Under\nCONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK gp is the shadow call stack pointer and\nload_global_pointer is a no-op, so the compiler-emitted\n\"sd ra, -8(gp)\" / \"ld ra, -8(gp)\" in every non-leaf function then write\nto, and return through, an attacker-controlled address -- an\nunprivileged kernel arbitrary-write and control-flow-hijack primitive.\nThe poisoned gp is saved to task_struct.scs_sp on return, so the reload\nis skipped on every subsequent entry as well.\n\nDecide \"came from userspace\" from the hardware sstatus.SPP bit (already\nin s1 at this point) instead of from tp, mirroring the check that\nret_from_exception already uses a few instructions later.  SPP is\nwritten by hardware on trap entry and cannot be forged from U-mode.\nLegitimate behaviour is unchanged: user entries (SPP=0) reload the task\nshadow call stack, nested kernel entries (SPP=1) skip it.",
  "id": "GHSA-7x79-hrpm-vw9w",
  "modified": "2026-10-24T15:32:50Z",
  "published": "2026-10-23T15:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-99018"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37b4401ee6fa06046446d55e97e8d11784080843"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d0697f192975dab5985e921989be1d85cf580e9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6639735367a7d491977e9e5e7afc50b489d81d83"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d1367a53137e379498eb8791295e58854378636"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.