GHSA-7WFC-WFH5-RXRH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-19 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

iio: pressure: bmp280: fix stack leak in bmp580 trigger handler

bmp580_trigger_handler() declares its scan buffer on the stack without an initializer and then memcpy()s 3 bytes of 24-bit sensor data into each 4-byte __le32 field. The high byte of comp_temp and comp_press is left uninitialized, and the channel storagebits is 32, so two bytes of stack are pushed to userspace per scan.

This is a regression from when the buffer lived in the private data, the move to a stack-local struct dropped the implicit zeroing. bme280_trigger_handler() was fixed up to handle this bug, but this driver was not fixed because there was no padding hole, but rather a short-fill issue.

Fix this all by just zero-initializing the structure on the stack.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-63965"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:15Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niio: pressure: bmp280: fix stack leak in bmp580 trigger handler\n\nbmp580_trigger_handler() declares its scan buffer on the stack without\nan initializer and then memcpy()s 3 bytes of 24-bit sensor data into\neach 4-byte __le32 field.  The high byte of comp_temp and comp_press is\nleft uninitialized, and the channel storagebits is 32, so two bytes of\nstack are pushed to userspace per scan.\n\nThis is a regression from when the buffer lived in the private data, the\nmove to a stack-local struct dropped the implicit zeroing.\nbme280_trigger_handler() was fixed up to handle this bug, but this\ndriver was not fixed because there was no padding hole, but rather a\nshort-fill issue.\n\nFix this all by just zero-initializing the structure on the stack.",
  "id": "GHSA-7wfc-wfh5-rxrh",
  "modified": "2026-07-19T18:31:47Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T18:31:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63965"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/387c86b582e0782ab332e7bfcd4e6e3f93922961"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58dfb6fe9dc80270cf7cc014837af4cbf928e3aa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a58400f58f82f3d8de9c067aa7cda690228c1ecc"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…