GHSA-7W3G-6V3X-44MP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 12:30 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix incorrect FI_NO_EXTENT handling in __destroy_extent_node()

When __destroy_extent_node() sets the inode flag FI_NO_EXTENT, it does not reset the length of the largest extent to 0 and update the inode folio. Since modifications to the extent tree are disallowed afterward, the cached largest extent may become stale. This can trigger the following error in xfstests generic/388:

F2FS-fs (dm-0): sanity_check_extent_cache: inode (ino=1761) extent info [220057, 57, 6] is incorrect, run fsck to fix

In the f2fs_drop_inode path, __destroy_extent_node() does not need to guarantee that et->node_cnt is 0, because concurrency with writeback is expected in this path, and writeback may update the extent cache.

This patch reverts commit ed78aeebef05 ("f2fs: fix node_cnt race between extent node destroy and writeback"), and remove the unnecessary zero check of et->node_cnt.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-63812"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T12:16:54Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix incorrect FI_NO_EXTENT handling in __destroy_extent_node()\n\nWhen __destroy_extent_node() sets the inode flag FI_NO_EXTENT, it does\nnot reset the length of the largest extent to 0 and update the inode\nfolio. Since modifications to the extent tree are disallowed afterward,\nthe cached largest extent may become stale. This can trigger the\nfollowing error in xfstests generic/388:\n\nF2FS-fs (dm-0): sanity_check_extent_cache: inode (ino=1761) extent info [220057, 57, 6] is incorrect, run fsck to fix\n\nIn the f2fs_drop_inode path, __destroy_extent_node() does not need to\nguarantee that et-\u003enode_cnt is 0, because concurrency with writeback\nis expected in this path, and writeback may update the extent cache.\n\nThis patch reverts commit ed78aeebef05 (\"f2fs: fix node_cnt race between\nextent node destroy and writeback\"), and remove the unnecessary zero\ncheck of et-\u003enode_cnt.",
  "id": "GHSA-7w3g-6v3x-44mp",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:47Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T12:30:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63812"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f70ddb28a3c71df124da5fa4040c808116d6bb9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20190e498057997532c7f186d081011f18e0a462"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58a5deb220bcac4c73bf58954c0845644c997487"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e4d8f98be63f98856a5176b9188dada6e7ba9ee"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edf12cbeeeabe799bd2ee21fdb5c336cce6fbad7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…