GHSA-7RMF-WCV2-R7W8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:05 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:05
VLAI
Details
Buffer overflow in the REPEAT function in IBM DB2 9.1 before FP9 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (trap) via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2010-0462.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-1560"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-04-27T15:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in the REPEAT function in IBM DB2 9.1 before FP9 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (trap) via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2010-0462.",
"id": "GHSA-7rmf-wcv2-r7w8",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:05:33Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:05:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-1560"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/58070"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A14613"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2010-April/002341.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/64041"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39500"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC65922"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21426108"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0982"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…