GHSA-7R96-J35V-9X4X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-25 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nstree: check listing permission before taking a namespace reference
legitimize_ns() takes a reference on the candidate namespace before may_list_ns() has decided whether the caller may see it. The __free(ns_put) cleanup on the denied path can drop the last reference to a mount namespace while we still hold the rcu read lock, and put_mnt_ns() may sleep there. This is the same problem commit 2ec2aff3c8e2 ("ns: make sure reference are dropped outside of rcu lock") fixed for the put_user() path. Neither ns_requested() nor may_list_ns() needs a reference, both only look at the namespace type and at the caller's own namespaces, so do the checks first and take the reference last.
Splat:
Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side critical section! WARNING: kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:332 at rcu_note_context_switch+0x238/0x2a0, CPU#5: a/3442 CPU: 5 UID: 1000 PID: 3442 Comm: a Not tainted 7.0.0-30-generic #30-Ubuntu PREEMPT(lazy) RIP: 0010:rcu_note_context_switch+0x238/0x2a0 Call Trace: __schedule+0xcf/0x650 schedule+0x27/0x90 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x30 __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x550/0xaf0 __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13/0x20 mutex_lock+0x3b/0x50 exp_funnel_lock+0xb2/0x260 synchronize_rcu_expedited+0xe7/0x220 namespace_unlock+0x26a/0x320 put_mnt_ns+0xd3/0x120 mntns_put+0xe/0x20 do_listns+0x13e/0x560 __do_sys_listns+0x126/0x2d0 __x64_sys_listns+0x20/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x2366/0x2390 do_syscall_64+0x105/0x5a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-97971"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-25T11:17:24Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnstree: check listing permission before taking a namespace reference\n\nlegitimize_ns() takes a reference on the candidate namespace before\nmay_list_ns() has decided whether the caller may see it. The\n__free(ns_put) cleanup on the denied path can drop the last reference to a\nmount namespace while we still hold the rcu read lock, and put_mnt_ns()\nmay sleep there. This is the same problem commit 2ec2aff3c8e2 (\"ns: make\nsure reference are dropped outside of rcu lock\") fixed for the put_user()\npath. Neither ns_requested() nor may_list_ns() needs a reference, both\nonly look at the namespace type and at the caller\u0027s own namespaces, so do\nthe checks first and take the reference last.\n\nSplat:\n\n Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side critical section!\n WARNING: kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:332 at rcu_note_context_switch+0x238/0x2a0, CPU#5: a/3442\n CPU: 5 UID: 1000 PID: 3442 Comm: a Not tainted 7.0.0-30-generic #30-Ubuntu PREEMPT(lazy)\n RIP: 0010:rcu_note_context_switch+0x238/0x2a0\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __schedule+0xcf/0x650\n schedule+0x27/0x90\n schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x30\n __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x550/0xaf0\n __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13/0x20\n mutex_lock+0x3b/0x50\n exp_funnel_lock+0xb2/0x260\n synchronize_rcu_expedited+0xe7/0x220\n namespace_unlock+0x26a/0x320\n put_mnt_ns+0xd3/0x120\n mntns_put+0xe/0x20\n do_listns+0x13e/0x560\n __do_sys_listns+0x126/0x2d0\n __x64_sys_listns+0x20/0x30\n x64_sys_call+0x2366/0x2390\n do_syscall_64+0x105/0x5a0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n \u003c/TASK\u003e",
"id": "GHSA-7r96-j35v-9x4x",
"modified": "2026-09-25T15:31:44Z",
"published": "2026-09-25T12:31:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97971"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56ea4e86832d8abe8930394473566c194d189f85"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9e673bf5d88aa898e52cef5c87058c3fa845bc71"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.