GHSA-7QG6-GCC3-HFPQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-05 02:48 – Updated: 2025-03-31 12:30
VLAI
Details

ownCloud Server before 4.5.7 does not properly check ownership of calendars, which allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary calendars via the calid parameter to /apps/calendar/export.php. NOTE: this issue has been reported as a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, but due to lack of details, it is uncertain what the root cause is.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-0304"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-06-05T15:44:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "ownCloud Server before 4.5.7 does not properly check ownership of calendars, which allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary calendars via the calid parameter to /apps/calendar/export.php.  NOTE: this issue has been reported as a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, but due to lack of details, it is uncertain what the root cause is.",
  "id": "GHSA-7qg6-gcc3-hfpq",
  "modified": "2025-03-31T12:30:40Z",
  "published": "2022-05-05T02:48:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-0304"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://owncloud.org/about/security/advisories/oC-SA-2013-007"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securite.intrinsec.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ISEC-V2013-01-v-1.0-Owncloud-4.5.4-Arbitrary-calendar-export.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…