GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-7JQ5-5RP7-V6GF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bridge: stp: Fix a potential use-after-free when deleting a bridge

The three STP timers are not supposed to be armed while the bridge is administratively down. They are synchronously deactivated when the bridge is put administratively down and the various call sites check for 'IFF_UP' before arming them.

This check is missing from br_topology_change_detection() and it is possible to engineer a situation in which the topology change timer is armed while the bridge is administratively down, resulting in a use-after-free [1] when the bridge is deleted.

Fix by adding the missing check and for good measures synchronously shutdown the three timers when the bridge is deleted.

[1] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object: ffff88811662b9b0 object type: timer_list hint: br_topology_change_timer_expired (net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c:120) WARNING: lib/debugobjects.c:629 at debug_print_object+0x1bc/0x450, CPU#9: ip/359

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72389"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:12Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbridge: stp: Fix a potential use-after-free when deleting a bridge\n\nThe three STP timers are not supposed to be armed while the bridge is\nadministratively down. They are synchronously deactivated when the\nbridge is put administratively down and the various call sites check for\n\u0027IFF_UP\u0027 before arming them.\n\nThis check is missing from br_topology_change_detection() and it is\npossible to engineer a situation in which the topology change timer is\narmed while the bridge is administratively down, resulting in a\nuse-after-free [1] when the bridge is deleted.\n\nFix by adding the missing check and for good measures synchronously\nshutdown the three timers when the bridge is deleted.\n\n[1]\nODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object: ffff88811662b9b0 object type: timer_list hint: br_topology_change_timer_expired (net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c:120)\nWARNING: lib/debugobjects.c:629 at debug_print_object+0x1bc/0x450, CPU#9: ip/359",
  "id": "GHSA-7jq5-5rp7-v6gf",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:27Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72389"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/297a747f59bff6573196d7236178144d66524e68"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a00517db8de4be7df3d483b215c5544fb30a191"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/39283907a25e5caf0f2bd2947f6e56644b01e2b7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40cbfa3a28e0919469d1b086629bb3ce38a83593"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c40eec06eeac37c58e47a6058eb32901218d5d4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4b3458ef88df4798632619f018791d4344bcd92"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c86579b0a2d201792bcb59316629f4ba4758cfc8"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…