GHSA-7H3Q-JHJR-X4RR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:39 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:39
VLAI?
Details
The multi-tenant database container feature in SAP HANA does not properly encrypt communications, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors, aka SAP Security Note 2233550.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-6150"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-08-05T14:59:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The multi-tenant database container feature in SAP HANA does not properly encrypt communications, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors, aka SAP Security Note 2233550.",
"id": "GHSA-7h3q-jhjr-x4rr",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:39:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:39:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6150"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://layersevensecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Layer-Seven-Security_SAP-Security-Notes_January-2016.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-hana-potential-wrong-encryption"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138453/SAP-HANA-DB-Encryption-Issue.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/96"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92064"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…