GHSA-7FV4-RMP7-G4QH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-11 18:31 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/vmalloc: fix page mapping if vm_area_alloc_pages() with high order fallback to order 0
The __vmap_pages_range_noflush() assumes its argument pages contains pages with the same page shift. However, since commit e9c3cda4d86e ("mm, vmalloc: fix high order __GFP_NOFAIL allocations"), if gfp_flags includes __GFP_NOFAIL with high order in vm_area_alloc_pages() and page allocation failed for high order, the pages may contain two different page shifts (high order and order-0). This could lead __vmap_pages_range_noflush() to perform incorrect mappings, potentially resulting in memory corruption.
Users might encounter this as follows (vmap_allow_huge = true, 2M is for PMD_SIZE):
kvmalloc(2M, __GFP_NOFAIL|GFP_X) __vmalloc_node_range_noprof(vm_flags=VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP) vm_area_alloc_pages(order=9) ---> order-9 allocation failed and fallback to order-0 vmap_pages_range() vmap_pages_range_noflush() __vmap_pages_range_noflush(page_shift = 21) ----> wrong mapping happens
We can remove the fallback code because if a high-order allocation fails, __vmalloc_node_range_noprof() will retry with order-0. Therefore, it is unnecessary to fallback to order-0 here. Therefore, fix this by removing the fallback code.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-45022"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-11T16:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/vmalloc: fix page mapping if vm_area_alloc_pages() with high order fallback to order 0\n\nThe __vmap_pages_range_noflush() assumes its argument pages** contains\npages with the same page shift. However, since commit e9c3cda4d86e (\"mm,\nvmalloc: fix high order __GFP_NOFAIL allocations\"), if gfp_flags includes\n__GFP_NOFAIL with high order in vm_area_alloc_pages() and page allocation\nfailed for high order, the pages** may contain two different page shifts\n(high order and order-0). This could lead __vmap_pages_range_noflush() to\nperform incorrect mappings, potentially resulting in memory corruption.\n\nUsers might encounter this as follows (vmap_allow_huge = true, 2M is for\nPMD_SIZE):\n\nkvmalloc(2M, __GFP_NOFAIL|GFP_X)\n __vmalloc_node_range_noprof(vm_flags=VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP)\n vm_area_alloc_pages(order=9) ---\u003e order-9 allocation failed and fallback to order-0\n vmap_pages_range()\n vmap_pages_range_noflush()\n __vmap_pages_range_noflush(page_shift = 21) ----\u003e wrong mapping happens\n\nWe can remove the fallback code because if a high-order allocation fails,\n__vmalloc_node_range_noprof() will retry with order-0. Therefore, it is\nunnecessary to fallback to order-0 here. Therefore, fix this by removing\nthe fallback code.",
"id": "GHSA-7fv4-rmp7-g4qh",
"modified": "2025-11-04T00:31:23Z",
"published": "2024-09-11T18:31:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45022"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/61ebe5a747da649057c37be1c37eb934b4af79ca"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c91618816f4d21fc574d7577a37722adcd4075b2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de7bad86345c43cd040ed43e20d9fad78a3ee59f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd1ffbb50ef4da5e1378a46616b6d7407dc795da"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.