GHSA-7CJ6-GQ26-374H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 09:31 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage
f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block marking state. The scenario is as follows:
create & write & fsync 'file A' write checkpoint - f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty - f2fs_write_checkpoint - f2fs_flush_merged_writes - f2fs_sync_node_pages - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true - f2fs_flush_nat_entries - f2fs_write_checkpoint end - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set SPO, "fsck --dry-run" find inode has already checkpointed but still with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi->node_write. The root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has fully completed.
This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_node_folio() and protects it with the sbi->node_write lock.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53368"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T09:17:01Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage\n\nf2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion\nwith the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block\nmarking state. The scenario is as follows:\n\ncreate \u0026 write \u0026 fsync \u0027file A\u0027 write checkpoint\n- f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode\n - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty\n - f2fs_write_checkpoint\n - f2fs_flush_merged_writes\n - f2fs_sync_node_pages\n - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node\n - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true\n - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied\n - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true\n - f2fs_flush_nat_entries\n - f2fs_write_checkpoint end\n - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set\n SPO, \"fsck --dry-run\" find inode has already checkpointed but still\n with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set\n\nThe state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state\nobserved in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi-\u003enode_write. The\nroot cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and\nHAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has\nfully completed.\n\nThis patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_node_folio() and\nprotects it with the sbi-\u003enode_write lock.",
"id": "GHSA-7cj6-gq26-374h",
"modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:43Z",
"published": "2026-07-19T09:31:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53368"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/019f9dda7f66e55eb94cd32e1d3fff5835f73fbc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b28a83ea4934215b5de906c3ee4fbfbc651573e0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bedb710b63ae1bd617e65d0a8cf6cea1200b3753"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.