GHSA-77Q4-M83Q-W76V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-09-01 21:18 – Updated: 2021-09-24 20:59Versions of browserify-hmr prior to 0.4.0 are missing origin validation on the websocket server.
This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to steal a developer's source code because the origin of requests to the websocket server that is used for Hot Module Replacement (HMR) are not validated.
Recommendation
Upgrade to version 0.4.0 or later.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "browserify-hmr"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-14730"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-08-31T18:33:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Versions of `browserify-hmr` prior to 0.4.0 are missing origin validation on the websocket server. \n\nThis vulnerability allows a remote attacker to steal a developer\u0027s source code because the origin of requests to the websocket server that is used for Hot Module Replacement (HMR) are not validated.\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nUpgrade to version 0.4.0 or later.",
"id": "GHSA-77q4-m83q-w76v",
"modified": "2021-09-24T20:59:15Z",
"published": "2020-09-01T21:18:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-14730"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/AgentME/browserify-hmr/issues/41"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.cal1.cn/post/Sniffing%20Codes%20in%20Hot%20Module%20Reloading%20Messages"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.cal1.cn/post/Sniffing%20Codes%20in%20Hot%20Module%20Reloading%20Messages)"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/AgentME/browserify-hmr"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/726"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Missing Origin Validation in browserify-hmr"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.