GHSA-7564-V46W-3PMR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-18 18:32 – Updated: 2026-10-18 18:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fprobe: Use guard(rcu_sched_notrace) and check rcu_is_watching()

unregister_fprobe() and unregister_fprobe_async() (used by BPF kprobe-multi) rely on standard RCU grace periods (synchronize_rcu() and call_rcu()) to wait until in-flight fprobe handlers complete before freeing the fprobe.

However, if an fprobe handler executes while RCU is not watching (such as in the idle loop or nohz_full extended quiescent states), standard RCU does not track preemption-disabled sections. Consequently, synchronize_rcu() does not wait for those executions, which can lead to a use-after-free if the fprobe is freed immediately after unregistration. Ensure handlers exit early when !rcu_is_watching().

Furthermore, fprobe_fgraph_entry() and fprobe_ftrace_entry() previously used guard(rcu)() and rcu_read_lock(), which invoke lockdep on every hit under CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. This adds overhead and can cause lockdep recursion if probed functions interact with lockdep.

Since rhltable_lookup() and rhl_for_each_entry_rcu() use rcu_dereference_all_check() (which checks rcu_read_lock_any_held()), holding preemption disabled via rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace() is fully valid and sufficient so long as rcu_is_watching() is true.

Define and use guard(rcu_sched_notrace)() across fprobe_ftrace_entry(), fprobe_fgraph_entry(), and fprobe_return(). This eliminates fast-path rcu_read_lock() and lockdep overhead while guaranteeing safe grace period synchronization.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-98861"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-18T16:17:40Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfprobe: Use guard(rcu_sched_notrace) and check rcu_is_watching()\n\nunregister_fprobe() and unregister_fprobe_async() (used by BPF\nkprobe-multi) rely on standard RCU grace periods (synchronize_rcu()\nand call_rcu()) to wait until in-flight fprobe handlers complete before\nfreeing the fprobe.\n\nHowever, if an fprobe handler executes while RCU is not watching (such\nas in the idle loop or nohz_full extended quiescent states), standard\nRCU does not track preemption-disabled sections. Consequently,\nsynchronize_rcu() does not wait for those executions, which can lead\nto a use-after-free if the fprobe is freed immediately after\nunregistration. Ensure handlers exit early when !rcu_is_watching().\n\nFurthermore, fprobe_fgraph_entry() and fprobe_ftrace_entry() previously\nused guard(rcu)() and rcu_read_lock(), which invoke lockdep on every\nhit under CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. This adds overhead and can cause lockdep\nrecursion if probed functions interact with lockdep.\n\nSince rhltable_lookup() and rhl_for_each_entry_rcu() use\nrcu_dereference_all_check() (which checks rcu_read_lock_any_held()),\nholding preemption disabled via rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace() is fully\nvalid and sufficient so long as rcu_is_watching() is true.\n\nDefine and use guard(rcu_sched_notrace)() across fprobe_ftrace_entry(),\nfprobe_fgraph_entry(), and fprobe_return(). This eliminates fast-path\nrcu_read_lock() and lockdep overhead while guaranteeing safe grace\nperiod synchronization.",
  "id": "GHSA-7564-v46w-3pmr",
  "modified": "2026-10-18T18:32:06Z",
  "published": "2026-10-18T18:32:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98861"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a85d0f00671b4d4527317c10ba018680f7d8d673"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd4a0d4993633b45470abf6da4ea0ca563402245"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0a6249190402a28f1e2925a81acf573157d55ef"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.