GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-744X-88R4-XJ59

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/tls: Consume empty data records in tls_sw_read_sock()

A peer may send a zero-length TLS application_data record; TLS 1.3 explicitly permits these as a traffic-analysis countermeasure (RFC 8446, Section 5.1). After decryption such a record has full_len == 0. tls_sw_read_sock() hands it to the read_actor, which has no payload to consume and returns zero. The loop treats a zero return as backpressure (used <= 0), requeues the skb at the head of rx_list, and stops. rx_list is serviced head-first on the next call, so the empty record is dequeued, fails the same way, and is requeued again; every later record on the connection is blocked behind it.

tls_sw_recvmsg() does not stall on this: a zero-length data record copies nothing and falls through to consume_skb(). Mirror that in the read_sock() path by recognizing an empty data record before the actor runs, consuming it, and continuing.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72330"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:06Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/tls: Consume empty data records in tls_sw_read_sock()\n\nA peer may send a zero-length TLS application_data record; TLS 1.3\nexplicitly permits these as a traffic-analysis countermeasure (RFC\n8446, Section 5.1). After decryption such a record has full_len ==\n0. tls_sw_read_sock() hands it to the read_actor, which has no\npayload to consume and returns zero. The loop treats a zero return\nas backpressure (used \u003c= 0), requeues the skb at the head of\nrx_list, and stops. rx_list is serviced head-first on the next\ncall, so the empty record is dequeued, fails the same way, and is\nrequeued again; every later record on the connection is blocked\nbehind it.\n\ntls_sw_recvmsg() does not stall on this: a zero-length data record\ncopies nothing and falls through to consume_skb(). Mirror that in\nthe read_sock() path by recognizing an empty data record before\nthe actor runs, consuming it, and continuing.",
  "id": "GHSA-744x-88r4-xj59",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:23Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72330"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0867b0f2513ebc1c475af9898c97f4772a68d964"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3be28e2c9cd0230cb51fd4967df095273afd3848"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b440cf766a557b08d25f1b571b3d57d039686e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8a4c9fc437b16aef38f86ce3275677e36924259"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ebc295ce343600c2d60c1e1e0c5d192080217457"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…