GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-6WQ7-XHX5-P3VW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

crypto: ccp - Check for page allocation failure correctly in TIO

Sashiko notes:

if __snp_alloc_firmware_pages() returns NULL under memory pressure, is it safe to pass it directly to page_address()?

On architectures without HASHED_PAGE_VIRTUAL, page_address(NULL) might compute a deterministic but invalid, non-zero virtual address. The subsequent if (tio_status) check would then evaluate to true, and sev_tsm_init_locked() would dereference the invalid pointer.

Indeed, page_address(NULL) will return non-NULL garbage here. Fix this by checking the page allocation itself for NULL, not the resulting virtual address.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-74403"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:42Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncrypto: ccp - Check for page allocation failure correctly in TIO\n\nSashiko notes:\n\n\u003e if __snp_alloc_firmware_pages() returns NULL under memory pressure, is it\n\u003e safe to pass it directly to page_address()?\n\u003e\n\u003e On architectures without HASHED_PAGE_VIRTUAL, page_address(NULL) might\n\u003e compute a deterministic but invalid, non-zero virtual address. The\n\u003e subsequent if (tio_status) check would then evaluate to true, and\n\u003e sev_tsm_init_locked() would dereference the invalid pointer.\n\nIndeed, page_address(NULL) will return non-NULL garbage here. Fix this by\nchecking the page allocation itself for NULL, not the resulting virtual\naddress.",
  "id": "GHSA-6wq7-xhx5-p3vw",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:43Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74403"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/17e1aae19a06d9f6da4b46d54fa2aeab77ec0c69"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a8d5370eef00eca132a292b1901c9914c817e385"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…