GHSA-6W6J-FMCG-FGJ3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid10: fix still_degraded being inverted in raid10_sync_request()
Commit fe6a19d40ceb ("md/md-bitmap: merge md_bitmap_start_sync() into bitmap_operations") converted still_degraded from int to bool, but inverted the assignment in the loop that checks whether the array will still be degraded after the current device is recovered: "still_degraded = 1" became "still_degraded = false".
As a result, recovering a device while another mirror is still missing calls md_bitmap_start_sync() with degraded == false, which clears bitmap bits that the still-missing device needs. When that device is re-added, its bitmap-based recovery finds the bits already cleared and skips every region written while the array was degraded, so it is marked In_sync while holding stale data: silent corruption.
Reproducer (raid10 near=2, 4 disks, internal bitmap): - fail and remove one disk of each mirror pair - write to the degraded array - re-add both disks and let recovery finish - "check" reports mismatch_cnt=262272 after 256 MiB of degraded writes and file contents differ; the second disk's "recovery" completes in milliseconds because everything is skipped
The same conversion in raid1 got it right (still_degraded = true). Restore the correct value.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-89558"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:39Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid10: fix still_degraded being inverted in raid10_sync_request()\n\nCommit fe6a19d40ceb (\"md/md-bitmap: merge md_bitmap_start_sync() into\nbitmap_operations\") converted still_degraded from int to bool, but\ninverted the assignment in the loop that checks whether the array will\nstill be degraded after the current device is recovered:\n\"still_degraded = 1\" became \"still_degraded = false\".\n\nAs a result, recovering a device while another mirror is still missing\ncalls md_bitmap_start_sync() with degraded == false, which clears bitmap\nbits that the still-missing device needs. When that device is re-added,\nits bitmap-based recovery finds the bits already cleared and skips every\nregion written while the array was degraded, so it is marked In_sync\nwhile holding stale data: silent corruption.\n\nReproducer (raid10 near=2, 4 disks, internal bitmap):\n - fail and remove one disk of each mirror pair\n - write to the degraded array\n - re-add both disks and let recovery finish\n - \"check\" reports mismatch_cnt=262272 after 256 MiB of degraded\n writes and file contents differ; the second disk\u0027s \"recovery\"\n completes in milliseconds because everything is skipped\n\nThe same conversion in raid1 got it right (still_degraded = true).\nRestore the correct value.",
"id": "GHSA-6w6j-fmcg-fgj3",
"modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:18Z",
"published": "2026-09-11T21:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89558"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00449d752bee9c8787f42ea1bf533a9fb17f9b6b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0efabe6229dc683dbf6eeebd0f9fddc7971ed420"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47f1441b281decde6954a2fa82b4131637d685ac"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9bb8da6ecb330a5b1ac9b96f1e55f134a7aef1d4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.