GHSA-6RR3-9M3V-FH4X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:32 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:19
VLAI
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in IrfanView before 4.37 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the LZW code stream in a GIF file.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-5351"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-02-14T19:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in IrfanView before 4.37 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the LZW code stream in a GIF file.",
  "id": "GHSA-6rr3-9m3v-fh4x",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T04:19:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:32:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-5351"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/89808"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/89820"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/101065"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54959"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2013-13"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.irfanview.com/main_history.htm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/64388"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…