GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-6PXH-C54R-CXC3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Fix effective prog array index with BPF_F_PREORDER

replace_effective_prog() and purge_effective_progs() located the slot in the effective array by walking the program hlist and counting entries linearly. That count does not match the array layout: compute_effective_ progs() places BPF_F_PREORDER programs at the front (ancestor cgroup first, attach order within a cgroup) and the rest after them (descendant cgroup first). So when a preorder program is present, the linear hlist position no longer equals the program's index in the effective array.

For replace_effective_prog() (bpf_link_update()) this overwrote the wrong slot, corrupting the effective order. For purge_effective_progs(), it could dummy out a slot belonging to a different program and leave the detached program in the array while bpf_prog_put() drops its reference, i.e. a use-after-free.

Fix both by replaying compute_effective_progs()'s placement (including the per-cgroup preorder reversal) in a shared effective_prog_pos() helper. Identify the entry by its struct bpf_prog_list pointer rather than by (prog, link) value, so the lookup resolves to exactly the attachment the syscall selected even when the same bpf_prog is attached to several cgroups in the hierarchy.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72427"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:16Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Fix effective prog array index with BPF_F_PREORDER\n\nreplace_effective_prog() and purge_effective_progs() located the slot in\nthe effective array by walking the program hlist and counting entries\nlinearly. That count does not match the array layout: compute_effective_\nprogs() places BPF_F_PREORDER programs at the front (ancestor cgroup\nfirst, attach order within a cgroup) and the rest after them (descendant\ncgroup first). So when a preorder program is present, the linear hlist\nposition no longer equals the program\u0027s index in the effective array.\n\nFor replace_effective_prog() (bpf_link_update()) this overwrote the\nwrong slot, corrupting the effective order. For purge_effective_progs(),\nit could dummy out a slot belonging to a different program and leave the\ndetached program in the array while bpf_prog_put() drops its reference,\ni.e. a use-after-free.\n\nFix both by replaying compute_effective_progs()\u0027s placement (including\nthe per-cgroup preorder reversal) in a shared effective_prog_pos()\nhelper. Identify the entry by its struct bpf_prog_list pointer rather\nthan by (prog, link) value, so the lookup resolves to exactly the\nattachment the syscall selected even when the same bpf_prog is attached\nto several cgroups in the hierarchy.",
  "id": "GHSA-6pxh-c54r-cxc3",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:29Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72427"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41b4320b84fdafe1ab586b06453d30d50415db59"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/525e408c27ae714e538b8c608c3a974df3ab6c92"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9697db03e010391c55ae75192cbdf30c5a72c114"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b584f107ab90222bd825dcb4c5977326ff684109"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f08aaee3152d0dfc578b3f2586932d82062701dd"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…