GHSA-6P2G-28FM-38RF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 17:57 – Updated: 2022-05-01 17:57
VLAI?
Details
The Skinny Call Control Protocol (SCCP) implementation in Cisco Unified CallManager (CUCM) 3.3 before 3.3(5)SR2a, 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR4, 4.2 before 4.2(3)SR1, and 5.0 before 5.0(4a)SU1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (loss of voice services) by sending crafted packets to the (1) SCCP (2000/tcp) or (2) SCCPS (2443/tcp) port.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-1833"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-04-03T00:19:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Skinny Call Control Protocol (SCCP) implementation in Cisco Unified CallManager (CUCM) 3.3 before 3.3(5)SR2a, 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR4, 4.2 before 4.2(3)SR1, and 5.0 before 5.0(4a)SU1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (loss of voice services) by sending crafted packets to the (1) SCCP (2000/tcp) or (2) SCCPS (2443/tcp) port.",
"id": "GHSA-6p2g-28fm-38rf",
"modified": "2022-05-01T17:57:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T17:57:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-1833"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33295"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24665"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1017826"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20070328-voip.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23181"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1144"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…