GHSA-6MJV-X284-3FG6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-08 03:31 – Updated: 2025-12-08 03:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &hwq->cq_lock deadlock issue

When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated when &hwq->cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to resolve the deadlock issue.

[name:lockdep&]WARNING: inconsistent lock state [name:lockdep&]-------------------------------- [name:lockdep&]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. [name:lockdep&]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: ffffff8028444600 (&hwq->cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0 [name:lockdep&]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0 ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8 handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0 generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134 call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74 do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4 el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78

Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&hwq->cq_lock); lock(&hwq->cq_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:

[name:lockdep&] stack backtrace: CPU: 7 PID: 260 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Tainted: G S W OE 6.1.17-mainline-android14-2-g277223301adb #1 Workqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler

Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x10c/0x160 show_stack+0x20/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xd8 dump_stack+0x20/0x60 print_usage_bug+0x584/0x76c mark_lock_irq+0x488/0x510 mark_lock+0x1ec/0x25c __lock_acquire+0x4d8/0xffc lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0 ufshcd_poll+0x68/0x1b0 ufshcd_transfer_req_compl+0x9c/0xc8 ufshcd_err_handler+0x3bc/0xea0 process_one_work+0x2f4/0x7e8 worker_thread+0x234/0x450 kthread+0x110/0x134 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-53760"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-08T02:15:51Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix \u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock deadlock issue\n\nWhen ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting\nfor the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and\nalso in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated\nwhen \u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use\nufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to\nresolve the deadlock issue.\n\n[name:lockdep\u0026]WARNING: inconsistent lock state\n[name:lockdep\u0026]--------------------------------\n[name:lockdep\u0026]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -\u003e {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.\n[name:lockdep\u0026]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:\n  ffffff8028444600 (\u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:\nufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0\n[name:lockdep\u0026]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:\n  lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c\n  _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c\n  ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0\n  ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]\n  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec\n  handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8\n  handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0\n  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c\n  gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134\n  call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74\n  do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4\n  el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78\n\u003csnip\u003e\n\nPossible unsafe locking scenario:\n       CPU0\n       ----\n  lock(\u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock);\n  \u003cInterrupt\u003e\n    lock(\u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock);\n  *** DEADLOCK ***\n2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:\n\n[name:lockdep\u0026]\n stack backtrace:\nCPU: 7 PID: 260 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Tainted: G S      W  OE\n6.1.17-mainline-android14-2-g277223301adb #1\nWorkqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler\n\n Call trace:\n  dump_backtrace+0x10c/0x160\n  show_stack+0x20/0x30\n  dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xd8\n  dump_stack+0x20/0x60\n  print_usage_bug+0x584/0x76c\n  mark_lock_irq+0x488/0x510\n  mark_lock+0x1ec/0x25c\n  __lock_acquire+0x4d8/0xffc\n  lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c\n  _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c\n  ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0\n  ufshcd_poll+0x68/0x1b0\n  ufshcd_transfer_req_compl+0x9c/0xc8\n  ufshcd_err_handler+0x3bc/0xea0\n  process_one_work+0x2f4/0x7e8\n  worker_thread+0x234/0x450\n  kthread+0x110/0x134\n  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20",
  "id": "GHSA-6mjv-x284-3fg6",
  "modified": "2025-12-08T03:31:03Z",
  "published": "2025-12-08T03:31:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53760"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ce8c49c7b53e0a2258b833eeab16a6d78f732d1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/948afc69615167a3c82430f99bfd046332b89912"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.