GHSA-6MJ6-F4J4-FWCX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:35 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:35
VLAI
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in the Lotus Word Pro import filter in LibreOffice before 3.3.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .lwp file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-2685"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-07-21T23:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the Lotus Word Pro import filter in LibreOffice before 3.3.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .lwp file.",
"id": "GHSA-6mj6-f4j4-fwcx",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:35:28Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:35:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2685"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?id=278831e37a23e9e2e29ca811c3a5398b7c67464d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?id=d93fa011d713100775cd3ac88c468b6830d48877"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2011-10/msg00019.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/953183"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:172"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/06/13"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/12/13"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…