GHSA-6MHR-74X2-98V9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 14:07 – Updated: 2026-06-17 14:07
VLAI
Summary
NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Secure Attachment
Details

Summary

With NC_SECURE_ATTACHMENTS=true, an authenticated uploader could deliver .html or .svg attachments that the browser rendered inline from the NocoDB origin instead of forcing a download.

Details

The signed attachment handler stored response-header overrides under PascalCase keys (ResponseContentDisposition, ResponseContentType) while the controller that served the file read them under lowercase-hyphen names (response-content-disposition). The mismatch dropped the Content-Disposition: attachment header, leaving Express to auto-render .html, .svg, and similar inline. The fix corrects the key case and additionally forces Content-Disposition: attachment and Content-Type: application/octet-stream for any MIME type not on the preview allowlist.

Impact

Stored Cross-Site Scripting in the NocoDB origin from inline-rendered uploads. Script executing in the victim's browser can read the auth JWT from localStorage. Exploitation requires authenticated upload permission and the secure-attachment mode to be enabled.

Credit

This issue was reported by @bugbunny-research. It was independently reported by @DavidCarliez.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "nocodb"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "0.301.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53929"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-17T14:07:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nWith `NC_SECURE_ATTACHMENTS=true`, an authenticated uploader could deliver `.html` or\n`.svg` attachments that the browser rendered inline from the NocoDB origin instead of\nforcing a download.\n\n### Details\nThe signed attachment handler stored response-header overrides under PascalCase keys\n(`ResponseContentDisposition`, `ResponseContentType`) while the controller that served\nthe file read them under lowercase-hyphen names (`response-content-disposition`). The\nmismatch dropped the `Content-Disposition: attachment` header, leaving Express to\nauto-render `.html`, `.svg`, and similar inline. The fix corrects the key case and\nadditionally forces `Content-Disposition: attachment` and\n`Content-Type: application/octet-stream` for any MIME type not on the preview\nallowlist.\n\n### Impact\nStored Cross-Site Scripting in the NocoDB origin from inline-rendered uploads. Script\nexecuting in the victim\u0027s browser can read the auth JWT from `localStorage`.\nExploitation requires authenticated upload permission and the secure-attachment mode\nto be enabled.\n\n### Credit\nThis issue was reported by [@bugbunny-research](https://github.com/bugbunny-research).\nIt was independently reported by [@DavidCarliez](https://github.com/DavidCarliez).",
  "id": "GHSA-6mhr-74x2-98v9",
  "modified": "2026-06-17T14:07:52Z",
  "published": "2026-06-17T14:07:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-6mhr-74x2-98v9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Secure Attachment"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…