GHSA-6MHQ-4W43-X55V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-14 09:31 – Updated: 2026-09-14 09:31
VLAI
Details

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Database data disclosure in Advanced Module Manager (Free, Pro) < 12.1.0, Conditional Content (Free, Pro) < 8.0.0, Content Templater (Pro) < 14.2.0, ReReplacer (Pro) < 16.2.0 for Joomla - The Conditions editor creates a default Condition Set name from the item to which the set is linked. The affected code accepts the database table and label-column names from the request. Although these names are quoted as SQL identifiers, they are not restricted to the tables and columns used by supported Regular Labs integrations. An attacker can therefore select a valid but unrelated database field. This is an authorization failure rather than SQL injection.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-85188"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-14T07:17:22Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Database data disclosure in Advanced Module Manager (Free, Pro) \u003c 12.1.0, Conditional Content (Free, Pro) \u003c 8.0.0, Content Templater (Pro) \u003c 14.2.0, ReReplacer (Pro) \u003c 16.2.0 for Joomla - The Conditions editor creates a default Condition Set name from the item to which the set is linked. The affected code accepts the database table and label-column names from the request. Although these names are quoted as SQL identifiers, they are not restricted to the tables and columns used by supported Regular Labs integrations. An attacker can therefore select a valid but unrelated database field. This is an authorization failure rather than SQL injection.",
  "id": "GHSA-6mhq-4w43-x55v",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T09:31:02Z",
  "published": "2026-09-14T09:31:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-85188"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.regularlabs.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.