GHSA-6GXW-85Q2-Q646
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-25 14:18 – Updated: 2025-11-27 08:42A credential disclosure vulnerability was found in Grype, affecting versions v0.68.0 through v0.104.0. If registry credentials are defined and the output of grype is written using the --file or --output json=<file> option, the registry credentials will be included unsanitized in the output file.
Impact
In Grype versions v0.68.0 through v0.104.0, when registry authentication is configured, those credentials can be incorrectly included in the output of a Grype scan (regardless of whether those credentials are actively being used for the current scan). Users that do not have registry authentication configured are not affected by this issue.
Registry credentials can be set via the Grype configuration file (e.g. registry.auth[].username, registry.auth[].password, registry.auth[].token) or environment variables (e.g., GRYPE_REGISTRY_AUTH_USERNAME, GRYPE_REGISTRY_AUTH_PASSWORD, GRYPE_REGISTRY_AUTH_TOKEN).
In order for the authentication details to be improperly included, the Grype file output format must be set to json with output target set to a file. For example --output json=file.json or --output json --file file.json. When these conditions are met, the configured credentials are not sanitized as they should be in the resulting JSON output file.
The authentication details could also be leaked via a malformed Grype Template. A Grype Template that includes the Descriptor.Registry.Auth fields would also include the unsanitized registry credentials. There are no known templates that include these fields.
Patches
The patch has been released in v0.104.1.
Workaround
Users running affected versions of grype can work around this vulnerability by redirecting stdout to a file instead of using the --file or --output options.
For example, replacing the command:
# using `--output json=path` (or `--file`) leaks credentials
grype --output json=test.json alpine:latest
with
# no use of `--output json=path` or `--file`. Output is sanitized...
grype --output json alpine:latest > test.json
...results in the same test.json output, but the credentials will be properly sanitized.
Resources
Patch pull request: https://github.com/anchore/grype/pull/3068
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/anchore/grype"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.68.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.104.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-65965"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-212"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-25T14:18:46Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-25T20:16:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A credential disclosure vulnerability was found in Grype, affecting versions `v0.68.0` through `v0.104.0`. If registry credentials are defined and the output of grype is written using the `--file` or `--output json=\u003cfile\u003e` option, the registry credentials will be included unsanitized in the output file.\n\n## Impact\n\nIn Grype versions `v0.68.0` through `v0.104.0`, when registry authentication is configured, those credentials can be incorrectly included in the output of a Grype scan (regardless of whether those credentials are actively being used for the current scan). Users that do not have registry authentication configured are not affected by this issue.\n\nRegistry credentials can be set via the Grype configuration file (e.g. `registry.auth[].username`, `registry.auth[].password`, `registry.auth[].token`) or environment variables (e.g., `GRYPE_REGISTRY_AUTH_USERNAME`, `GRYPE_REGISTRY_AUTH_PASSWORD`, `GRYPE_REGISTRY_AUTH_TOKEN`).\n\nIn order for the authentication details to be improperly included, the Grype file output format must be set to `json` with output target set to a file. For example `--output json=file.json` or `--output json --file file.json`. When these conditions are met, the configured credentials are not sanitized as they should be in the resulting JSON output file.\n\nThe authentication details could also be leaked via a malformed Grype Template. A Grype Template that includes the `Descriptor.Registry.Auth` fields would also include the unsanitized registry credentials. There are no known templates that include these fields.\n\n## Patches\nThe patch has been released in `v0.104.1`.\n\n## Workaround\nUsers running affected versions of grype can work around this vulnerability by redirecting stdout to a file instead of using the `--file` or `--output` options.\n\nFor example, replacing the command:\n\n```\n# using `--output json=path` (or `--file`) leaks credentials\ngrype --output json=test.json alpine:latest\n```\n\nwith\n\n```\n# no use of `--output json=path` or `--file`. Output is sanitized...\ngrype --output json alpine:latest \u003e test.json\n```\n\n...results in the same `test.json` output, but the credentials will be properly sanitized.\n\n## Resources\nPatch pull request: https://github.com/anchore/grype/pull/3068",
"id": "GHSA-6gxw-85q2-q646",
"modified": "2025-11-27T08:42:37Z",
"published": "2025-11-25T14:18:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/anchore/grype/security/advisories/GHSA-6gxw-85q2-q646"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-65965"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/anchore/grype/pull/3068"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/anchore/grype/commit/39f7fa17af2739cafe9b27176d4a68f7c05f21c1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/anchore/grype/commit/c99f79de49a58dc16d7fd8f35160b169b87db9de"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/anchore/grype"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Grype has a credential disclosure vulnerability in its JSON output"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.