GHSA-6F64-FMVF-65HV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-22 18:30 – Updated: 2026-08-22 18:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/smc: fix qentry overwrite for CONFIRM_LINK and ADD_LINK_CONT in smc_llc_event_handler()
The SMC_LLC_CONFIRM_LINK / SMC_LLC_ADD_LINK_CONT branch in smc_llc_event_handler() stores an incoming qentry into the local LLC flow without first checking whether a qentry is already pending. If a malicious or buggy peer sends a second CONFIRM_LINK or ADD_LINK_CONT request while a flow is active and flow->qentry is already set, smc_llc_flow_qentry_set() overwrites the pointer without freeing the previous allocation, leaking one kmalloc-96 object per spurious message.
The sibling SMC_LLC_DELETE_LINK branch already has the correct !flow->qentry guard. Apply the same guard to the CONFIRM_LINK/ADD_LINK_CONT branch so that a duplicate message when qentry is already occupied falls through to break and is freed by the kfree(qentry) at the out: label, rather than silently leaking the existing allocation.
The response direction (smc_llc_rx_response()) is unaffected: it already guards with flow->qentry at the equivalent site and drops duplicate responses correctly.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-74719"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-22T16:16:46Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/smc: fix qentry overwrite for CONFIRM_LINK and ADD_LINK_CONT in smc_llc_event_handler()\n\nThe SMC_LLC_CONFIRM_LINK / SMC_LLC_ADD_LINK_CONT branch in\nsmc_llc_event_handler() stores an incoming qentry into the local LLC flow\nwithout first checking whether a qentry is already pending. If a malicious or\nbuggy peer sends a second CONFIRM_LINK or ADD_LINK_CONT request while a flow is\nactive and flow-\u003eqentry is already set, smc_llc_flow_qentry_set() overwrites the\npointer without freeing the previous allocation, leaking one kmalloc-96 object\nper spurious message.\n\nThe sibling SMC_LLC_DELETE_LINK branch already has the correct !flow-\u003eqentry\nguard. Apply the same guard to the CONFIRM_LINK/ADD_LINK_CONT branch so that a\nduplicate message when qentry is already occupied falls through to break and is\nfreed by the kfree(qentry) at the out: label, rather than silently leaking the\nexisting allocation.\n\nThe response direction (smc_llc_rx_response()) is unaffected: it already guards\nwith flow-\u003eqentry at the equivalent site and drops duplicate responses\ncorrectly.",
"id": "GHSA-6f64-fmvf-65hv",
"modified": "2026-08-22T18:30:30Z",
"published": "2026-08-22T18:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74719"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06734dfeaeba886aab1bf147249195b888ac3e4d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10cb31b2b74cb664c6c95cf72364d7d5c483ab82"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/976245094925bab9bc39366b2e9ab44ffcde61d0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1e980d7a9e7ee6faf4f5fd7b450413b969af26d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfc336a9fbbf09805f3dfe25c195a4db90af2846"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c23c409228629107203d3c3e95fff1473173f1a6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0eb87677c76b157cdf8eb7c1f19e56227165a33"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e384f3cba6ea709f5b2272b1770db4ce14047f78"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.