GHSA-69GG-C325-75FX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-21 21:30 – Updated: 2024-10-22 18:32
VLAI?
Details

Vilo 5 Mesh WiFi System <= 5.16.1.33 is vulnerable to Insecure Permissions. Lack of authentication in the custom TCP service on port 5432 allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to gain administrative access over the router.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-40087"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-21T21:15:06Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Vilo 5 Mesh WiFi System \u003c= 5.16.1.33 is vulnerable to Insecure Permissions. Lack of authentication in the custom TCP service on port 5432 allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to gain administrative access over the router.",
  "id": "GHSA-69gg-c325-75fx",
  "modified": "2024-10-22T18:32:11Z",
  "published": "2024-10-21T21:30:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40087"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/byu-cybersecurity-research/vilo/blob/main/vulns/CVE-2024-40087.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://vilo.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…