GHSA-6828-FJ37-MVWR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-06-25 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths

Two sites in mm/hugetlb.c allocate a hugetlb folio via alloc_hugetlb_folio() (consuming a VMA reservation) and then call copy_user_large_folio(), which became int-returning in commit 1cb9dc4b475c ("mm: hwpoison: support recovery from HugePage copy-on-write faults") and can now fail (e.g. -EHWPOISON on a hwpoisoned source page). On the failure path, folio_put() restores the global hugetlb pool count through free_huge_folio(), but the per-VMA reservation map entry is left marked consumed:

  • hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte() resubmission path (UFFDIO_COPY)
  • copy_hugetlb_page_range() fork-time CoW path when hugetlb_try_dup_anon_rmap() fails (rare: pinned hugetlb anon folio under fork)

User-visible effect: on UFFDIO_COPY into a private hugetlb VMA where the resubmission copy fails, the reservation for that address is leaked from the VMA's reserve map. A subsequent fault at the same address takes the no-reservation path, and under hugetlb pool pressure the task is SIGBUSed at an address it had previously reserved. The fork-time CoW path leaks the same way in the child VMA's reserve map, though it requires the much rarer combination of pinned hugetlb anon page + hwpoisoned source.

Add the missing restore_reserve_on_error() call before folio_put() on both error paths.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53154"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:32Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths\n\nTwo sites in mm/hugetlb.c allocate a hugetlb folio via\nalloc_hugetlb_folio() (consuming a VMA reservation) and then call\ncopy_user_large_folio(), which became int-returning in commit 1cb9dc4b475c\n(\"mm: hwpoison: support recovery from HugePage copy-on-write faults\") and\ncan now fail (e.g.  -EHWPOISON on a hwpoisoned source page).  On the\nfailure path, folio_put() restores the global hugetlb pool count through\nfree_huge_folio(), but the per-VMA reservation map entry is left marked\nconsumed:\n\n  - hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte() resubmission path (UFFDIO_COPY)\n  - copy_hugetlb_page_range() fork-time CoW path when\n    hugetlb_try_dup_anon_rmap() fails (rare: pinned hugetlb anon\n    folio under fork)\n\nUser-visible effect: on UFFDIO_COPY into a private hugetlb VMA where the\nresubmission copy fails, the reservation for that address is leaked from\nthe VMA\u0027s reserve map.  A subsequent fault at the same address takes the\nno-reservation path, and under hugetlb pool pressure the task is SIGBUSed\nat an address it had previously reserved.  The fork-time CoW path leaks\nthe same way in the child VMA\u0027s reserve map, though it requires the much\nrarer combination of pinned hugetlb anon page + hwpoisoned source.\n\nAdd the missing restore_reserve_on_error() call before folio_put() on both\nerror paths.",
  "id": "GHSA-6828-fj37-mvwr",
  "modified": "2026-06-25T09:31:19Z",
  "published": "2026-06-25T09:31:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53154"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40c81856e622a9dc59294a90d169ac07ea25b0b0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45e33d43243d71d089af42f5077b8213cee6610f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d6e1dd3ad1340cd8b6d554b7aa93d8f0a1c6d38"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c72469ac0f274bde3f0df60a4584e14a123d0aa6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e47bf16af3c45470ea32f2241fa69aefe0dd61bd"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…