GHSA-667R-XXJV-C9MM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-30 23:45 – Updated: 2026-09-30 23:45Impact
Fastify runs a route's validator and, for a result shaped like { value, error }, unwraps it: an error becomes a validation failure and value replaces the request part. This convention is intended for synchronous custom compilers (for example Joi). A JSON Schema $async validator, however, resolves with the validated data itself, so Fastify applied the same unwrapping to it. If a request part validated by an $async schema contains a value property, Fastify replaced the whole request part with that nested value before the handler ran, so a value or error property in the payload was attacker-controlled. An application that dispatches operations from the validated request body could then act on data that never satisfied the route schema, leading to unauthorized state changes or disclosure. Reaching the vulnerable path requires the route to use an $async request schema.
Patches
Fastify no longer treats an asynchronous validation result as a { value, error } wrapper: an async validator's resolved value is used only to determine pass or fail, and it can no longer replace the request part or inject an error. The synchronous custom-compiler contract is unchanged. Patched in fastify 5.12.2 and 6.0.0.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid $async request schemas, or perform the security-sensitive check in an onRequest or preHandler hook rather than relying on the schema-validated request part. Custom async validator compilers should signal failure by throwing (rejecting) rather than returning an { error } object.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "fastify"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.12.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-84504"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-30T23:45:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-04T10:17:13Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nFastify runs a route\u0027s validator and, for a result shaped like `{ value, error }`, unwraps it: an `error` becomes a validation failure and `value` replaces the request part. This convention is intended for synchronous custom compilers (for example Joi). A JSON Schema `$async` validator, however, resolves with the validated data itself, so Fastify applied the same unwrapping to it. If a request part validated by an `$async` schema contains a `value` property, Fastify replaced the whole request part with that nested value before the handler ran, so a `value` or `error` property in the payload was attacker-controlled. An application that dispatches operations from the validated request body could then act on data that never satisfied the route schema, leading to unauthorized state changes or disclosure. Reaching the vulnerable path requires the route to use an `$async` request schema.\n\n### Patches\n\nFastify no longer treats an asynchronous validation result as a `{ value, error }` wrapper: an async validator\u0027s resolved value is used only to determine pass or fail, and it can no longer replace the request part or inject an error. The synchronous custom-compiler contract is unchanged. Patched in fastify `5.12.2` and `6.0.0`.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid `$async` request schemas, or perform the security-sensitive check in an `onRequest` or `preHandler` hook rather than relying on the schema-validated request part. Custom async validator compilers should signal failure by throwing (rejecting) rather than returning an `{ error }` object.",
"id": "GHSA-667r-xxjv-c9mm",
"modified": "2026-09-30T23:45:45Z",
"published": "2026-09-30T23:45:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify/security/advisories/GHSA-667r-xxjv-c9mm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84504"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify/commit/f02d8d4ab1ab208f10819c4dc213595b06497833"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify/releases/tag/v5.12.2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "fastify vulnerable to request body replacement via an async validation result collision"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.