GHSA-666Q-FGC6-3X4W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfrm: Check for underflow in xfrm_state_mtu
Leo Lin reported OOB write issue in esp component:
xfrm_state_mtu() returns u32 but performs its arithmetic in unsigned modulo-2^32 space using an attacker-influenced "header_len + authsize + net_adj" subtracted from a small "mtu" argument. A nobody user can install an IPv4 ESP tunnel SA with a large authentication key (XFRMA_ALG_AUTH_TRUNC, e.g. hmac(sha512), 64-byte key, 64-byte trunc), configure a small interface MTU (68 bytes), and set XFRMA_TFCPAD to a large value. When a single UDP datagram is then sent through the tunnel, xfrm_state_mtu() underflows to a near-2^32 value, and esp_output() consumes it as a signed int via:
padto = min(x->tfcpad, xfrm_state_mtu(x, mtu_cached))
esp.tfclen = padto - skb->len (assigned to int)
esp.tfclen ends up negative (e.g. -207). It is sign-extended to size_t when passed to memset() inside esp_output_fill_trailer(), producing a ~16 EB write of zeroes at skb_tail_pointer(skb). KASAN logs it as "Write of size 18446744073709551537 at addr ffff888...".
Check for underflow and return 1. This causes the sendmsg attempt to fail with ENETUNREACH.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-64009"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:40Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfrm: Check for underflow in xfrm_state_mtu\n\nLeo Lin reported OOB write issue in esp component:\n\n xfrm_state_mtu() returns u32 but performs its arithmetic in unsigned\n modulo-2^32 space using an attacker-influenced \"header_len + authsize +\n net_adj\" subtracted from a small \"mtu\" argument. A nobody user can\n install an IPv4 ESP tunnel SA with a large authentication key\n (XFRMA_ALG_AUTH_TRUNC, e.g. hmac(sha512), 64-byte key, 64-byte trunc),\n configure a small interface MTU (68 bytes), and set XFRMA_TFCPAD to a\n large value. When a single UDP datagram is then sent through the\n tunnel, xfrm_state_mtu() underflows to a near-2^32 value, and\n esp_output() consumes it as a signed int via:\n\n padto = min(x-\u003etfcpad, xfrm_state_mtu(x, mtu_cached))\n esp.tfclen = padto - skb-\u003elen (assigned to int)\n\n esp.tfclen ends up negative (e.g. -207). It is sign-extended to size_t\n when passed to memset() inside esp_output_fill_trailer(), producing a\n ~16 EB write of zeroes at skb_tail_pointer(skb). KASAN logs it as\n \"Write of size 18446744073709551537 at addr ffff888...\".\n\nCheck for underflow and return 1. This causes the sendmsg attempt to\nfail with ENETUNREACH.",
"id": "GHSA-666q-fgc6-3x4w",
"modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:55Z",
"published": "2026-07-19T18:31:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64009"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1021d2877b689a648b27815c854557a917122e93"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a41b1b31c61c52b972278ce1732a1443f5e89ed"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3db50ceeacb52806d8fe86fb1dfe944df0b9f789"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/742b04d0550b0ec89dcbc99537ec88653bd1ad90"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8014f70c4e6e5ab101ae3860a614e65e988372e3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/820e501be8aee4b365d218d83227b314309c5fda"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/82ac903e0b519849647657b8c48d21237ada06a2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fccd685b32df5aaf6bad4381eeda216468e283f0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.