GHSA-63HQ-HRGX-PFWM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-15 15:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix transaction abort on set received ioctl due to item overflow

If the set received ioctl fails due to an item overflow when attempting to add the BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL we have to abort the transaction since we did some metadata updates before.

This means that if a user calls this ioctl with the same received UUID field for a lot of subvolumes, we will hit the overflow, trigger the transaction abort and turn the filesystem into RO mode. A malicious user could exploit this, and this ioctl does not even requires that a user has admin privileges (CAP_SYS_ADMIN), only that he/she owns the subvolume.

Fix this by doing an early check for item overflow before starting a transaction. This is also race safe because we are holding the subvol_sem semaphore in exclusive (write) mode.

A test case for fstests will follow soon.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43359"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-191"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T15:16:46Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: fix transaction abort on set received ioctl due to item overflow\n\nIf the set received ioctl fails due to an item overflow when attempting to\nadd the BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL we have to abort the transaction\nsince we did some metadata updates before.\n\nThis means that if a user calls this ioctl with the same received UUID\nfield for a lot of subvolumes, we will hit the overflow, trigger the\ntransaction abort and turn the filesystem into RO mode. A malicious user\ncould exploit this, and this ioctl does not even requires that a user\nhas admin privileges (CAP_SYS_ADMIN), only that he/she owns the subvolume.\n\nFix this by doing an early check for item overflow before starting a\ntransaction. This is also race safe because we are holding the subvol_sem\nsemaphore in exclusive (write) mode.\n\nA test case for fstests will follow soon.",
  "id": "GHSA-63hq-hrgx-pfwm",
  "modified": "2026-05-15T15:30:33Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T15:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43359"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e57b8cac2ba0d38aac76c1ecdfd8b899e3581a5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41fb97353ff58fa4f31904c343fc8e3df2f7517d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87f2c46003fce4d739138aab4af1942b1afdadac"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b19c0465e4daad5aa8f60552ea0578cf31a11b1e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9914db13ac15aca3b74544c0bb1a2e0dad1f174"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d11aefe654a04fc41996d254748d6a38b6b0a7be"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…