GHSA-5XFJ-V547-VCCJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:12 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:12
VLAI?
Details
The request handler in JBossWS in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP06 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP04 does not properly validate the resource path during a request for a WSDL file with a custom web-service endpoint, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary XML files via a crafted request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-0027"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-03-09T21:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The request handler in JBossWS in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP06 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP04 does not properly validate the resource path during a request for a WSDL file with a custom web-service endpoint, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary XML files via a crafted request.",
"id": "GHSA-5xfj-v547-vccj",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:12:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:12:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0027"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479668"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPAPP-1548"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0346.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0347.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0348.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0349.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34112"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34023"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021817"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…