GHSA-5W75-96C9-PH5Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:03 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:03
VLAI
Details
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in MediaWiki 1.6.0 up to versions before 1.6.7 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and web script via the edit form.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-2895"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-06-07T10:02:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in MediaWiki 1.6.0 up to versions before 1.6.7 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and web script via the edit form.",
"id": "GHSA-5w75-96c9-ph5q",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:03:43Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:03:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2895"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27029"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-announce/2006-June/000048.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20458"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/tags/REL1_6_7/phase3/RELEASE-NOTES"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2159"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…