GHSA-5V9V-XRMH-22C6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-27 06:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ALSA: compress: Fix task creation error unwind

snd_compr_task_new() allocates the driver task before validating the returned DMA buffers and reserving file descriptors. When either of those later steps fails, the core frees its task wrapper and DMA-buffer references without calling the driver's task_free() callback. Any driver resources allocated by task_create() are therefore leaked.

The dual-fd allocation path also jumps to cleanup without storing the negative get_unused_fd_flags() result in retval. Since retval still contains the successful task_create() return value, TASK_CREATE can incorrectly report success although the task was discarded.

Preserve the fd allocation errors and call task_free() when failure occurs after a successful task_create() callback.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64485"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:34Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nALSA: compress: Fix task creation error unwind\n\nsnd_compr_task_new() allocates the driver task before validating the\nreturned DMA buffers and reserving file descriptors. When either of\nthose later steps fails, the core frees its task wrapper and DMA-buffer\nreferences without calling the driver\u0027s task_free() callback. Any\ndriver resources allocated by task_create() are therefore leaked.\n\nThe dual-fd allocation path also jumps to cleanup without storing the\nnegative get_unused_fd_flags() result in retval. Since retval still\ncontains the successful task_create() return value, TASK_CREATE can\nincorrectly report success although the task was discarded.\n\nPreserve the fd allocation errors and call task_free() when failure\noccurs after a successful task_create() callback.",
  "id": "GHSA-5v9v-xrmh-22c6",
  "modified": "2026-07-27T06:30:40Z",
  "published": "2026-07-25T12:31:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64485"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/426a9947a38d272d0e19c031658da68e31128667"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a60127debb9e370d6c0e22a307326b624a141f3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b27a75d42044d9d4709095617730b91b1c4af423"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…