GHSA-5QV7-J6W5-FR4M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-07 03:03 – Updated: 2026-05-07 03:03
VLAI
Summary
imageproc has fragile bounds check when sampling from image
Details

A read of pixels was coded as modifying coordinates to lie within the image bounds. It would calculate a coordinate by adding a constant to an input and taking the minimum of the resulting coordinate and 'dimension - 1'. This would not protect against malicious inputs that could overflow the addition. Following the tricked bounds check, the image could then be sampled at multiple differently calculated coordinates that exceeded the bounds.

Severity
6.9 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "imageproc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.24.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.24.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.24.0"
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "imageproc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.25.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.25.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.25.0"
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "imageproc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.26.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.26.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-07T03:03:48Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A read of pixels was coded as modifying coordinates to lie within the image bounds. It would calculate a coordinate by adding a constant to an input and taking the minimum of the resulting coordinate and \u0027dimension - 1\u0027. This would not protect against malicious inputs that could overflow the addition. Following the tricked bounds check, the image could then be sampled at multiple differently calculated coordinates that exceeded the bounds.",
  "id": "GHSA-5qv7-j6w5-fr4m",
  "modified": "2026-05-07T03:03:48Z",
  "published": "2026-05-07T03:03:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/image-rs/imageproc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0115.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "imageproc has fragile bounds check when sampling from image"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.