GHSA-5P99-RG43-PX7F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-09-16 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: arm64: Make VNCR invalidation participate in MMU invalidation retry

A VNCR TLB invalidation can occur on one vcpu while another vcpu is faulting in this same page. Without correctly handling this, we can end up with the following scenario:

  • vcpu A walks the PTs to translate VNCR
  • before vcpu A is able to grab the MMU lock to insert the TLB, vcpu B updates the S1 PTs with an invalid entry, and issues a TLBI S1E2 for this VA
  • vcpu A inserts the TLB for something that is now invalid

This isn't a new problem, and we manage S2 by having the MMU notifier to bump up mmu_invalidate_seq on invalidation so that the fault can be replayed.

We can perform something similar here, and extend invalidate_vncr_va() to update the same counter, clearly indicating that the context has changed under our feet. This is safe as the invalidation always happen while holding the MMU lock for write, and that we sample the sequence number before walking S1.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89916"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T11:17:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: arm64: Make VNCR invalidation participate in MMU invalidation retry\n\nA VNCR TLB invalidation can occur on one vcpu while another vcpu is\nfaulting in this same page. Without correctly handling this, we can\nend up with the following scenario:\n\n- vcpu A walks the PTs to translate VNCR\n- before vcpu A is able to grab the MMU lock to insert the TLB,\n  vcpu B updates the S1 PTs with an invalid entry, and issues\n  a TLBI S1E2 for this VA\n- vcpu A inserts the TLB for something that is now invalid\n\nThis isn\u0027t a new problem, and we manage S2 by having the MMU notifier\nto bump up mmu_invalidate_seq on invalidation so that the fault can be\nreplayed.\n\nWe can perform something similar here, and extend invalidate_vncr_va() to\nupdate the same counter, clearly indicating that the context has\nchanged under our feet. This is safe as the invalidation always happen\nwhile holding the MMU lock for write, and that we sample the sequence\nnumber before walking S1.",
  "id": "GHSA-5p99-rg43-px7f",
  "modified": "2026-09-16T15:31:02Z",
  "published": "2026-09-16T12:30:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89916"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/11ee3faab4f1755d126bead9f882e75a7a677860"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b7324f3a0c1072b9d578b8d42f199506753f26e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8580e7aa189b0c6c5bb4d94b8352728a7c35bbd"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…