GHSA-5MWR-C944-45Q4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-31 12:30 – Updated: 2024-02-08 18:30
VLAI?
Details
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Luděk Melichar Better Anchor Links allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Better Anchor Links: from n/a through 1.7.5.
Severity ?
7.1 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-22287"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-31T12:16:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lud\u011bk Melichar Better Anchor Links allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Better Anchor Links: from n/a through 1.7.5.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-5mwr-c944-45q4",
"modified": "2024-02-08T18:30:39Z",
"published": "2024-01-31T12:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22287"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/better-anchor-links/wordpress-better-anchor-links-plugin-1-7-5-csrf-to-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…