GHSA-5GGJ-XWVC-9X57

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-10-30 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/mediatek: Fix potential NULL dereference in mtk_crtc_destroy()

In mtk_crtc_create(), if the call to mbox_request_channel() fails then we set the "mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan" pointer to NULL. In that situation, we do not call cmdq_pkt_create().

During the cleanup, we need to check if the "mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan" is NULL first before calling cmdq_pkt_destroy(). Calling cmdq_pkt_destroy() is unnecessary if we didn't call cmdq_pkt_create() and it will result in a NULL pointer dereference.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-53056"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-19T18:15:25Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/mediatek: Fix potential NULL dereference in mtk_crtc_destroy()\n\nIn mtk_crtc_create(), if the call to mbox_request_channel() fails then we\nset the \"mtk_crtc-\u003ecmdq_client.chan\" pointer to NULL.  In that situation,\nwe do not call cmdq_pkt_create().\n\nDuring the cleanup, we need to check if the \"mtk_crtc-\u003ecmdq_client.chan\"\nis NULL first before calling cmdq_pkt_destroy().  Calling\ncmdq_pkt_destroy() is unnecessary if we didn\u0027t call cmdq_pkt_create() and\nit will result in a NULL pointer dereference.",
  "id": "GHSA-5ggj-xwvc-9x57",
  "modified": "2026-10-30T15:31:59Z",
  "published": "2024-11-19T18:31:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53056"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32ac6dccf561af97f20a3831430577d8a978e672"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4018651ba5c409034149f297d3dd3328b91561fd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c60583a87cb4a85b69d1f448f0be5eb6ec62cbb2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb05e973698f4af008c7fb6e0cfa6a2fa1d98409"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.