GHSA-5G7G-FPRM-CGPP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-06 12:30 – Updated: 2026-05-08 21:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/ionic: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in ionic_query_port
The function ionic_query_port() calls ib_device_get_netdev() without checking the return value which could lead to NULL pointer dereference, Fix it by checking the return value and return -ENODEV if the 'ndev' is NULL.
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-43282"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-06T12:16:49Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/ionic: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in ionic_query_port\n\nThe function ionic_query_port() calls ib_device_get_netdev() without\nchecking the return value which could lead to NULL pointer dereference,\nFix it by checking the return value and return -ENODEV if the \u0027ndev\u0027 is\nNULL.",
"id": "GHSA-5g7g-fprm-cgpp",
"modified": "2026-05-08T21:31:22Z",
"published": "2026-05-06T12:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43282"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b96156c927cd83c109e2e3946e6111dce73231f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81932a46dfd0db10a03f46f0b1c7ef946ac4552f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd80bd7105f88189f47d465ca8cb7d115570de30"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…