GHSA-5FV5-XJMM-VVX9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-09-16 12:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

usb-storage: ene_ub6250: fix race between scan work and probe

ene_ub6250_probe() calls usb_stor_probe2(), which starts the usb-storage infrastructure and schedules the delayed scan work. The driver then calls ene_get_card_type(), which sends an ENE command through ene_send_scsi_cmd() and the usb-storage bulk transfer helpers.

Both the delayed scan work, through usb_stor_Bulk_max_lun(), and ene_get_card_type() use us->current_urb. The scan work serializes this access with us->dev_mutex, but the ENE card-type probe does not. If the scan work runs while ene_get_card_type() is still using us->current_urb, usb_submit_urb() warns that the URB is already active.

Serialize ene_get_card_type() with us->dev_mutex, matching the locking used by the scan path.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-90031"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T11:17:16Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb-storage: ene_ub6250: fix race between scan work and probe\n\nene_ub6250_probe() calls usb_stor_probe2(), which starts the usb-storage\ninfrastructure and schedules the delayed scan work.  The driver then\ncalls ene_get_card_type(), which sends an ENE command through\nene_send_scsi_cmd() and the usb-storage bulk transfer helpers.\n\nBoth the delayed scan work, through usb_stor_Bulk_max_lun(), and\nene_get_card_type() use us-\u003ecurrent_urb.  The scan work serializes this\naccess with us-\u003edev_mutex, but the ENE card-type probe does not.  If the\nscan work runs while ene_get_card_type() is still using us-\u003ecurrent_urb,\nusb_submit_urb() warns that the URB is already active.\n\nSerialize ene_get_card_type() with us-\u003edev_mutex, matching the locking\nused by the scan path.",
  "id": "GHSA-5fv5-xjmm-vvx9",
  "modified": "2026-09-16T12:30:46Z",
  "published": "2026-09-16T12:30:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90031"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c67f2ba9c5f7c5ab3670671c0d51c6504bcaf74"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/445fc368c6bc73eff0aeb3818cf5f355facfbb16"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5082546702c32a2700894d2c0ace784e038ef6a3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8936d95dd04d34db96d4d1e3899eee52605bbedc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9481bc04a8c351ed883a7f0e10939bbe9120ead7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/996c319b8bd5ada1f62daae0d331d0b23e0f2117"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c261a83131e241d67cb73ab578d0265bc19cfb5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cd335f4f41e84d1ab88d80150ffee8dee9650d7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.