GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-5FPW-5C2C-J4PP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

OPP: Fix race between OPP addition and lookup

A race exists between dev_pm_opp_add_dynamic() and dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact():

CPU0 (add) CPU1 (lookup) ------------------------------- ------------------------------ _opp_add() mutex_lock() list_add(&new_opp->node, head) mutex_unlock() _opp_table_find_key() mutex_lock() dev_pm_opp_get(opp) kref_get() mutex_unlock() kref_init(&new_opp->kref) dev_pm_opp_put() kref_put_mutex()

The newly added OPP is inserted into the list before its kref is initialized. A concurrent lookup can find this OPP and increment its reference count while it is still uninitialized, leading to refcount corruption and a potential premature free.

Fix this by initializing ->kref and ->opp_table before making the OPP visible via list_add(). This ensures any concurrent lookup observes a fully initialized object.

[ Viresh: Updated commit log ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-74405"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:42Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nOPP: Fix race between OPP addition and lookup\n\nA race exists between dev_pm_opp_add_dynamic() and\ndev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact():\n\n  CPU0 (add)                          CPU1 (lookup)\n  -------------------------------     ------------------------------\n  _opp_add()\n    mutex_lock()\n    list_add(\u0026new_opp-\u003enode, head)\n    mutex_unlock()                    _opp_table_find_key()\n                                        mutex_lock()\n                                        dev_pm_opp_get(opp)\n                                          kref_get()\n                                        mutex_unlock()\n    kref_init(\u0026new_opp-\u003ekref)\n                                      dev_pm_opp_put()\n                                        kref_put_mutex()\n\nThe newly added OPP is inserted into the list before its kref is\ninitialized. A concurrent lookup can find this OPP and increment its\nreference count while it is still uninitialized, leading to refcount\ncorruption and a potential premature free.\n\nFix this by initializing -\u003ekref and -\u003eopp_table before making the OPP\nvisible via list_add(). This ensures any concurrent lookup observes a\nfully initialized object.\n\n[ Viresh: Updated commit log ]",
  "id": "GHSA-5fpw-5c2c-j4pp",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:43Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74405"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46696b0b2123475d7f95909435c09808fc5ffd23"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bb75bd7d9ae7672034f73ce67a57e6ac89bb39e5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5e1cc9a284bff2510981643a5bca4bc4c21b81a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…