GHSA-5FJ4-62HP-5PFC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:08 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:08
VLAI
Details
Realtek NDIS driver rt640x64.sys, file version 10.1.505.2015, fails to do any size checking on an input buffer from user space, which the driver assumes has a size greater than zero bytes. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must send an IRP with a system buffer size of 0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-11867"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-02-12T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Realtek NDIS driver rt640x64.sys, file version 10.1.505.2015, fails to do any size checking on an input buffer from user space, which the driver assumes has a size greater than zero bytes. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must send an IRP with a system buffer size of 0.",
"id": "GHSA-5fj4-62hp-5pfc",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:08:44Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:08:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11867"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://downwithup.github.io/CVEPosts.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.realtek.cz/realtek-network-drivers.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…